Literature DB >> 10199638

Maps versus clusters: different representations of auditory space in the midbrain and forebrain.

Y E Cohen1, E I Knudsen.   

Abstract

The auditory system determines the location of stimuli based on the evaluation of specific cues. The analysis begins in the tonotopic pathway, where these cues are processed in parallel, frequency-specific channels. This frequency-specific information is processed further in the midbrain and in the forebrain by specialized, space-processing pathways that integrate information across frequency channels, creating high-order neurons tuned to specific locations in space. Remarkably, the results of this integrative step are represented very differently in the midbrain and forebrain: in the midbrain, space is represented in maps, whereas, in the forebrain, space is represented in clusters of similarly tuned neurons. We propose that these different representations reflect the different roles that these two brain areas have in guiding behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10199638     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01295-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   13.837


  23 in total

Review 1.  Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; W Zheng; W M DeBello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modular organization of intrinsic connections associated with spectral tuning in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  H L Read; J A Winer; C E Schreiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiple sites of adaptive plasticity in the owl's auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  William M DeBello; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Recurrent antitopographic inhibition mediates competitive stimulus selection in an attention network.

Authors:  Dihui Lai; Sebastian Brandt; Harald Luksch; Ralf Wessel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reconsidering evidence for the suppression model of the octave illusion.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Jason B Mattingley; Simon A Moss
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

6.  Attending points in time and space.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange; Ulrike M Krämer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Top-down control of multimodal sensitivity in the barn owl optic tectum.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Auditory cortex mapmaking: principles, projections, and plasticity.

Authors:  Christoph E Schreiner; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls.

Authors:  Greg L Miller; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.