Literature DB >> 19549117

The number of negative pelvic lymph nodes removed does not affect the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Alana M Murphy1, Douglas S Berkman, Manisha Desai, Mitchell C Benson, James M McKiernan, Ketan K Badani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess patients who had radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for pT2-4 N0M0 prostate cancer, to determine if LN yield affects the risk of biochemical failure (BCF), as the extent of PLND at the time of RP has become increasingly uncertain with the decreasing trend in tumour stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the Columbia University Urologic Oncology Database for patients with pT2-4 N0M0 prostate cancer treated with RP from 1990 to 2005. Exclusion criteria included <12 months of follow-up, incomplete clinical and pathological data, and neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or immediate adjuvant ADT or external beam radiotherapy. Unadjusted and adjusted models were used to determine the ability of clinical and pathological variables to predict BCF.
RESULTS: The final dataset included 964 patients, with a mean age of 60.5 years and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 6.2 ng/mL. The median (range) LN yield was 7 (1-42) and the median follow-up 59 (12-190) months. In the unadjusted and adjusted models, preoperative PSA, pathological Gleason score, pathological stage, surgical margin status and year of surgery were significant predictors of BCF. The LN group was not a significant predictor of BCF in both the unadjusted and adjusted model (P = 0.759 and 0.408, respectively). When patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups, LN yield remained an insignificant predictor of BCF.
CONCLUSION: A higher LN yield at the time of RP does not increase the chance of cure for patients with pT2-4N0M0 prostate cancer. This lack of a survival advantage holds true for patients with high-risk disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549117      PMCID: PMC5508720          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08707.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; Natalia Sadetsky; Janeen DuChane; Peter R Carroll; Eric A Klein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Giuseppe Zanni; Vincenzo Scattoni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Zoltan Varga; Rolf Von Knobloch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Victor E Reuter; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  David S DiMarco; Horst Zincke; Thomas J Sebo; Jeffrey Slezak; Erik J Bergstralh; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Breast cancer survival according to number of nodes removed.

Authors:  David N Krag; Richard M Single
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Is a limited lymph node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Pia Bader; Fiona C Burkhard; Regula Markwalder; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Ganesh S Palapattu; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The survival benefit of lymph node dissection at the time of removal of kidney, prostate and urothelial carcinomas: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Anatomic extent of pelvic lymph node dissection: impact on long-term cancer-specific outcomes in men with positive lymph nodes at time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Trinity J Bivalacqua; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael A Gorin; Mohamad E Allaf; H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.

Authors:  Steven N Seyedin; Darrion L Mitchell; Sarah L Mott; J Kyle Russo; Chad R Tracy; Anthony N Snow; Jessica R Parkhurst; Mark C Smith; John M Buatti; John M Watkins
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Determinants of long-term survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: the role of extensive pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  M Moschini; N Fossati; F Abdollah; G Gandaglia; V Cucchiara; P Dell'Oglio; S Luzzago; S F Shariat; F Dehò; A Salonia; F Montorsi; A Briganti
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Sense and nonsense of an extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Van Baelen; Nicolas Mottet; Martin Spahn; Alberto Briganti; Paolo Gontero; Steven Joniau
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10-09

6.  Role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jae Young Joung; In-Chang Cho; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-07-24

7.  Association of molecular biomarkers expression with biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer through tissue microarray immunostaining.

Authors:  Ding Ma; Zhe Zhou; Bing Yang; Qun He; Qian Zhang; Xiang-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Multiparametric MRI for recurrent prostate cancer post radical prostatectomy and postradiation therapy.

Authors:  Flavio Barchetti; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Extended lymph node dissection in robotic radical prostatectomy: Current status.

Authors:  Sameer Chopra; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Inderbir Gill; Monish Aron
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Upregulation of Talin-1 expression associates with advanced pathological features and predicts lymph node metastases and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Hui-Jun Chen; Shao-Hao Chen; Xue-Yi Xue; Hong Chen; Qing-Shui Zheng; Yong Wei; Xiao-Dong Li; Jin-Bei Huang; Hai Cai; Xiong-Lin Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.