Literature DB >> 16806432

Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Sue A Joslyn1, Badrinath R Konety.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Controversy exists regarding the benefit of extended lymphadenectomy at radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We sought to determine whether more extended lymphadenectomy, along with radical prostatectomy, resulted in a decreased risk of prostate cancer-specific death at 10 years.
METHODS: Data on all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (with or without lymphadenectomy) for prostate cancer obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (1988 to 1991) were examined. All surviving patients had a minimal follow-up of 10 years. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the independent effect of lymphadenectomy on the risk of prostate cancer-specific death.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing excision of at least 4 lymph nodes (node-positive and node-negative patients) or more than 10 nodes (only node-negative patients) had a lower risk of prostate cancer-specific death at 10 years than did those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. The removal of a greater number of nodes was associated with a greater likelihood of the presence of positive nodes. The presence of more than one positive node was associated with a greater risk of prostate cancer-related death.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing more extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy could improve the accuracy of staging and reduce the risk of prostate cancer-specific death in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16806432     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  61 in total

1.  Preoperative sentinel lymph node mapping of the prostate using PET/CT fusion imaging and Ga-68-labeled tilmanocept in an animal model.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane; Salman Farchshchi-Heydari; Claude M James; Christopher H Davis; Anne M Wallace; Carl K Hoh; David R Vera
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Should all men having a radical prostatectomy have a pelvic lymph node dissection? No.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Rodolphe Thuret; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Why all prostate cancer surgery should include an adequate lymph node dissection.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival for patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian von Bodman; Guilherme Godoy; Daher C Chade; Angel Cronin; Laura J Tafe; Samson W Fine; Vincent Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ilija Aleksic; Tyler Luthringer; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

6.  Elective pelvic versus prostate bed-only salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Changhoon Song; Hyun-Cheol Kang; Jae-Sung Kim; Keun-Yong Eom; In Ah Kim; Jin-Beom Chung; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Preclinical evaluation of robotic-assisted sentinel lymph node fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Salman Farshchi-Heydari; Zhengtao Qin; Sean A Hickey; David J Hall; Christopher J Kane; David R Vera
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Branden Duffey; Briony Varda; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Determination of adequate pelvic lymph node dissection range for Japanese males undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Hidenori Iwai; Kei Nagase; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-28

Review 10.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Robert Jan Smeenk; Hanneke J M Meijer; Alfred J Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.