Literature DB >> 15540734

Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Mohamad E Allaf1, Ganesh S Palapattu, Bruce J Trock, H Ballentine Carter, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the influence of the anatomical extent of pelvic lymph node dissection performed at radical prostatectomy on lymph node yield, staging accuracy and time to prostate specific antigen progression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 1992 and April 2003, 2 surgeons at 1 hospital performed 2,135 and 1,865 radical prostatectomies with pelvic lymph node dissection, respectively. One surgeon routinely performed an extended lymph node dissection while the second surgeon performed a limited pelvic lymphadenectomy. The number of lymph nodes extracted and the number of patients with positive lymph nodes detected were analyzed and compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival between the 2 groups of patients with occult nodal disease.
RESULTS: Extended lymph node dissection removed more lymph nodes (mean 11.6 vs 8.9, p<0.0001) and detected more lymph node positive disease (3.2% vs 1.1%, p<0.0001) than the more anatomically limited technique. This finding held true for patients across all pathology groups. Among men with lymph node positive disease involving less than 15% of extracted nodes, the 5-year prostate specific antigen progression-free rate for extended lymph node dissection was 43% versus 10% for the more limited lymph node dissection (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to limited lymph node dissection, extended pelvic lymphadenectomy appears to identify men with positive lymph nodes more frequently. A significant benefit in biochemical recurrence-free survival may exist for certain subgroups undergoing the extended dissection. However, because the results may be influenced by stage migration, longer followup is necessary to determine whether the apparent therapeutic effect persists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15540734     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140912.45821.1d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  74 in total

1.  Why all prostate cancer surgery should include an adequate lymph node dissection.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schumacher; F C Burkhard; U E Studer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The emergence of radioimmunoscintigraphy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Keane; Inger L Rosner; M Scott Wingo; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

4.  Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?

Authors:  Hillary M Ross; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Janet E Cowan; Jeffry P Simko; Thomas M Wheeler; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the efficacy of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Lu Yang; Xiao Lv; Siyuan Bu; Fan Wan; Shengqiang Qian; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Tianyong Fan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  [Sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Experience after more than 800 interventions].

Authors:  D Weckermann; M Hamm; R Dorn; T Wagner; F Wawroschek; R Harzmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Robert Jan Smeenk; Hanneke J M Meijer; Alfred J Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Microbiological evaluation of infected pelvic lymphocele after robotic prostatectomy: potential predictors for culture positivity and selection of the best empirical antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  Alaa Hamada; Catalina Hwang; Jorge Fleisher; Ingolf Tuerk
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  [Value of lymphadenectomy for limited nodal recurrence of prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent].

Authors:  I Wolff; M-O Grimm; M Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.