OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an extended pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (EPLND) on the oncologic outcomes of men with LN-positive prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent an open radical prostatectomy by one of two surgeons at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1992 and 2003. The first surgeon routinely performed a limited pelvic LN dissection (LPLND), whereas the second performed an EPLND. Men with positive LNs from each cohort were compared for differences in oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Positive LNs were found in 94 men (2.2%), 21 (22.3%) with an LPLND and 73 (77.7%) with an EPLND. On average, LPLND and EPLND yielded 11.4 and 14.6 nodes, respectively (P = .022). The two groups were similar in terms of the number of positive LNs (1.4 vs 1.8, P = .223) and the proportion of patients with <15% positive nodes (57.1% vs 69.9%, P = .300). At a median follow-up of 10.5 years, patients who underwent an EPLND had superior oncologic outcomes compared with the LPLND group: 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 30.1% vs 7.1% (P = .018), 10-year metastasis-free survival of 62.2% vs 22.2% (P = .035), and 10-year cancer-specific survival of 83.6% vs 52.6% (P = .199). This analysis demonstrated an augmented improvement in biochemical recurrence-free survival in men with <15% positive nodes. CONCLUSION: In addition to affording valuable staging information, an EPLND may confer a therapeutic benefit to patients found to have positive LNs at the time of radical prostatectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an extended pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (EPLND) on the oncologic outcomes of men with LN-positive prostate cancer. METHODS:Patients were identified who underwent an open radical prostatectomy by one of two surgeons at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1992 and 2003. The first surgeon routinely performed a limited pelvic LN dissection (LPLND), whereas the second performed an EPLND. Men with positive LNs from each cohort were compared for differences in oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Positive LNs were found in 94 men (2.2%), 21 (22.3%) with an LPLND and 73 (77.7%) with an EPLND. On average, LPLND and EPLND yielded 11.4 and 14.6 nodes, respectively (P = .022). The two groups were similar in terms of the number of positive LNs (1.4 vs 1.8, P = .223) and the proportion of patients with <15% positive nodes (57.1% vs 69.9%, P = .300). At a median follow-up of 10.5 years, patients who underwent an EPLND had superior oncologic outcomes compared with the LPLND group: 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 30.1% vs 7.1% (P = .018), 10-year metastasis-free survival of 62.2% vs 22.2% (P = .035), and 10-year cancer-specific survival of 83.6% vs 52.6% (P = .199). This analysis demonstrated an augmented improvement in biochemical recurrence-free survival in men with <15% positive nodes. CONCLUSION: In addition to affording valuable staging information, an EPLND may confer a therapeutic benefit to patients found to have positive LNs at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Giuseppe Zanni; Vincenzo Scattoni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Urology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Marco Roscigno; Giuseppe Zanni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Michael L Blute; James H Eastham; Markus Graefen; Axel Heidenreich; Jeffrey R Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Urs E Studer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Karim Touijer; Farhang Rabbani; Javier Romero Otero; Fernando P Secin; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Jeffrey R Karnes; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Cesare Cozzarini; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Marco Bianchi; Massimo Freschi; Claudio Doglioni; Ferruccio Fazio; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Michael L Blute Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alana M Murphy; Douglas S Berkman; Manisha Desai; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan; Ketan K Badani Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Sameer Siddiqui; Stephanie Bagniewski; Erik J Bergstralh; R Jeffrey Karnes; Igor Frank; Michael L Blute Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-07-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Mahir Maruf; Thomas P Frye; Akhil Muthigi; Michael Kongnyuy; Subin G Valayil; Peter A Pinto Journal: Future Oncol Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.404
Authors: Philipp Mandel; Clemens Rosenbaum; Raisa S Pompe; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Felix K Chun; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Baris Turkbey; Harsh K Agarwal; Joanna Shih; Marcelino Bernardo; Yolanda L McKinney; Dagane Daar; Gary L Griffiths; Sandeep Sankineni; Linda Johnson; Kinzya B Grant; Juanita Weaver; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Mukesh Harisinghani; Paula Jacobs; William Dahut; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Tobias Maurer; Thomas Horn; Kathleen Herkommer; Marie Hegemann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta Journal: Turk J Urol Date: 2016-12
Authors: Harriet C Thoeny; Sebastiano Barbieri; Johannes M Froehlich; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Moschini; N Fossati; F Abdollah; G Gandaglia; V Cucchiara; P Dell'Oglio; S Luzzago; S F Shariat; F Dehò; A Salonia; F Montorsi; A Briganti Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 5.554