Literature DB >> 23987158

Anatomic extent of pelvic lymph node dissection: impact on long-term cancer-specific outcomes in men with positive lymph nodes at time of radical prostatectomy.

Trinity J Bivalacqua1, Phillip M Pierorazio, Michael A Gorin, Mohamad E Allaf, H Ballentine Carter, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an extended pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (EPLND) on the oncologic outcomes of men with LN-positive prostate cancer.
METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent an open radical prostatectomy by one of two surgeons at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1992 and 2003. The first surgeon routinely performed a limited pelvic LN dissection (LPLND), whereas the second performed an EPLND. Men with positive LNs from each cohort were compared for differences in oncologic outcomes.
RESULTS: Positive LNs were found in 94 men (2.2%), 21 (22.3%) with an LPLND and 73 (77.7%) with an EPLND. On average, LPLND and EPLND yielded 11.4 and 14.6 nodes, respectively (P = .022). The two groups were similar in terms of the number of positive LNs (1.4 vs 1.8, P = .223) and the proportion of patients with <15% positive nodes (57.1% vs 69.9%, P = .300). At a median follow-up of 10.5 years, patients who underwent an EPLND had superior oncologic outcomes compared with the LPLND group: 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 30.1% vs 7.1% (P = .018), 10-year metastasis-free survival of 62.2% vs 22.2% (P = .035), and 10-year cancer-specific survival of 83.6% vs 52.6% (P = .199). This analysis demonstrated an augmented improvement in biochemical recurrence-free survival in men with <15% positive nodes.
CONCLUSION: In addition to affording valuable staging information, an EPLND may confer a therapeutic benefit to patients found to have positive LNs at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23987158      PMCID: PMC3762567          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  30 in total

1.  Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Giuseppe Zanni; Vincenzo Scattoni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Cookson; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine Tangen; J Brantley Thrasher; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Marco Roscigno; Giuseppe Zanni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Michael L Blute; James H Eastham; Markus Graefen; Axel Heidenreich; Jeffrey R Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1,380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006.

Authors:  Michael Musch; Virgilijus Klevecka; Ulla Roggenbuck; Darko Kroepfl
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Farhang Rabbani; Javier Romero Otero; Fernando P Secin; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Jeffrey R Karnes; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Cesare Cozzarini; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Marco Bianchi; Massimo Freschi; Claudio Doglioni; Ferruccio Fazio; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  The number of negative pelvic lymph nodes removed does not affect the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alana M Murphy; Douglas S Berkman; Manisha Desai; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Houston Thompson; Sameer Siddiqui; Stephanie Bagniewski; Erik J Bergstralh; R Jeffrey Karnes; Igor Frank; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Significance of micrometastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masato Fujisawa; Hideaki Miyake
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.279

View more
  16 in total

1.  Identification of men with the highest risk of early disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Vinson Wang; Phillip M Pierorazio; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Phuoc T Tran; Ashley E Ross; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.

Authors:  Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Mahir Maruf; Thomas P Frye; Akhil Muthigi; Michael Kongnyuy; Subin G Valayil; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Long-term oncological outcomes in patients with limited nodal disease undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection without adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Philipp Mandel; Clemens Rosenbaum; Raisa S Pompe; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Felix K Chun; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Takuma Narita; Takuya Koie; Teppei Ookubo; Koji Mitsuzuka; Shintaro Narita; Hayato Yamamoto; Takamitsu Inoue; Shingo Hatakeyama; Sadafumi Kawamura; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  A Phase I Dosing Study of Ferumoxytol for MR Lymphography at 3 T in Patients With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Harsh K Agarwal; Joanna Shih; Marcelino Bernardo; Yolanda L McKinney; Dagane Daar; Gary L Griffiths; Sandeep Sankineni; Linda Johnson; Kinzya B Grant; Juanita Weaver; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Mukesh Harisinghani; Paula Jacobs; William Dahut; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Tobias Maurer; Thomas Horn; Kathleen Herkommer; Marie Hegemann; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Functional and Targeted Lymph Node Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Sebastiano Barbieri; Johannes M Froehlich; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Determinants of long-term survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: the role of extensive pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  M Moschini; N Fossati; F Abdollah; G Gandaglia; V Cucchiara; P Dell'Oglio; S Luzzago; S F Shariat; F Dehò; A Salonia; F Montorsi; A Briganti
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  Current technique and results for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Roger Li; Firas G Petros; Janet B Kukreja; Stephen B Williams; John W Davis
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.