Literature DB >> 17222625

Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

Ryan K Berglund1, Natalia Sadetsky, Janeen DuChane, Peter R Carroll, Eric A Klein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Limited bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection performed at radical prostatectomy provides staging information that is used to guide further disease management. Given the effects of widespread prostate specific antigen testing and stage migration, most procedures in the United States are performed for low risk disease, which has a low probability (less than 1%) of lymph node metastasis. We compared 5-year treatment failure rates in patients with low, intermediate and high risk disease who underwent radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared treatment failure rates for radical prostatectomy in 4,693 patients enrolled in the CaPSURE database who underwent radical prostatectomy with or without limited pelvic lymph node dissection. Secondary analysis was performed as a function of pelvic lymph node dissection and risk group based on pretreatment stage, grade and prostate specific antigen. Treatment failure rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: The 5-year failure-free survival rate was 70% in the no pelvic lymph node dissection group and 74% in the limited pelvic lymph node dissection group (p = 0.11), while the rates in the low, intermediate and high risk groups were 81% and 82% (p = 0.83), 71% and 63% (p = 0.21), and 42% and 48% (p = 0.45) in the no vs limited pelvic lymph node dissection groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that pelvic lymph node dissection status was not a predictor of treatment failure (p = 0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates in a large cohort of patients that limited pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy has no effect on treatment failure rates at 5 years in those at low, intermediate and high risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17222625     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

1.  Should all men having a radical prostatectomy have a pelvic lymph node dissection? No.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Rodolphe Thuret; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

4.  PSA density versus risk stratification for lymphadenectomy-making decision in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; John Srigley; Linda A Mayhew; R Bryan Rumble; Claire Crossley; Amber Hunter; Neil Fleshner; Bish Bora; Robin McLeod; Sheila McNair; Bernard Langer; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  [Role of lymph node dissection in prostate cancer].

Authors:  T Schlomm; C Börgermann; H Heinzer; H Rübben; H Huland; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Radical transurethral resection of the prostate. An alternative therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M A Reuter; K Dietz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.

Authors:  Steven N Seyedin; Darrion L Mitchell; Sarah L Mott; J Kyle Russo; Chad R Tracy; Anthony N Snow; Jessica R Parkhurst; Mark C Smith; John M Buatti; John M Watkins
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  The number of negative pelvic lymph nodes removed does not affect the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alana M Murphy; Douglas S Berkman; Manisha Desai; Mitchell C Benson; James M McKiernan; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Clinical experience with limited lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in Korea: single center comparison of 247 open and 354 robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy series.

Authors:  Daeheon Choi; Doejung Kim; Yoon Soo Kyung; Ju Hyun Lim; Sang Hoon Song; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.