Literature DB >> 29079967

Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.

Steven N Seyedin1, Darrion L Mitchell2, Sarah L Mott3, J Kyle Russo4, Chad R Tracy5, Anthony N Snow6, Jessica R Parkhurst1, Mark C Smith1, John M Buatti1, John M Watkins7.   

Abstract

The clinical impact of lymph node dissection extent remains undetermined in the contemporary setting, as reflected in care pattern variations. Despite some series demonstrating a direct relationship between number of lymph nodes identified and detection of nodal involvement, the correlation between lymph node yield and disease control or survival outcomes remains unclear. Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, pre-RP PSA <30, and pT2-3a/N0 disease at RP were retrospectively identified from two databases for inclusion. Those who received pre- or post-RP radiotherapy or hormone therapy were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method was employed for survival probability estimation. Cox regression models were used to assess bRFS differences between subsets. From 2002 to 2010, 667 eligible patients were identified. The median age was 61 yrs. (range, 43-76), with median PSA 5.6 ng/dL (0.9-28.0). At RP, most patients had pT2c (64%) disease with Gleason Score (GS) ≤6 (43%) or 7 (48%); 218 (33%) patients had positive margins (M+). At median clinical and PSA follow-up of 96 and 87 months, respectively, 146 patients (22%) experienced PSA failure with an estimated bRFS of 81%/76% at 5/8 years. For patients who underwent LND, univariable analysis identified PSA (at diagnosis), higher GS (≥7, at biopsy or RP), intermediate/high risk stratification, M+ as adversely associated with bRFS (all p < 0.01). A higher number of LNs excised was not associated with improved bRFS for the entire cohort (HR = 0.97, p = 0.27), nor for any clinical risk stratum, biopsy GS, or RP GS subgroup. This study did not demonstrate an association between LN yield and bRFS in patients with clinically localized pT2-3a/pN0 prostate cancer managed with RP alone, either in the entire population or with substratification by clinical risk stratum or GS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical relapse free survival; Localized prostate cancer; Lymph node dissection; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29079967      PMCID: PMC5924586          DOI: 10.1007/s12253-017-0349-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  25 in total

1.  Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; Natalia Sadetsky; Janeen DuChane; Peter R Carroll; Eric A Klein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Giuseppe Zanni; Vincenzo Scattoni; Luc Valiquette; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; J Fondurulia; M H Chen; I Kaplan; C J Beard; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; A Wein; C N Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Detection of occult lymph node metastases in locally advanced node-negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Debra Hawes; Frank H Brands; Susan Groshen; Jie Cai; John P Stein; Gary Lieskovsky; Donald G Skinner; Richard J Cote
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  David S DiMarco; Horst Zincke; Thomas J Sebo; Jeffrey Slezak; Erik J Bergstralh; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Fernando J Bianco; Andrew J Vickers; Christopher J DiBlasio; Paul A Fearn; Farhang Rabbani; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Carsten H Ohlmann; Sergej Polyakov
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nivedita Bhatta-Dhar; Alwyn M Reuther; Craig Zippe; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Ganesh S Palapattu; Bruce J Trock; H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  The survival benefit of different lymph node yields in radical prostatectomy for pN1M0 prostate cancer patients: Implications from a population-based study.

Authors:  Jieping Hu; Yue Yu; Wei Liu; Jialei Zhong; Xiaochen Zhou; Haibo Xi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.