Literature DB >> 15758719

The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.

David S DiMarco1, Horst Zincke, Thomas J Sebo, Jeffrey Slezak, Erik J Bergstralh, Michael L Blute.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent data suggest that extended lymph node dissection in prostate cancer may be necessary for accurate staging. With limited lymph node dissection apparently node negative cases might be under staged. We determined the impact that the number of lymph nodes removed at radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has on cancer progression and cause specific survival in pTXNO cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the RRP prostate cancer database on 7,036 patients with clinical T1 to T3 disease, no adjuvant therapy and node negative disease in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era from 1987 to 2000. Factors evaluated were the number of lymph nodes obtained at RRP, preoperative PSA, clinical and pathological stage and grade, margin status, year of surgery and specific surgeon for 5 surgeons who operated throughout the period and performed more than 500 RRPs. Cox analysis was done to determine the RR of progression (PSA or systemic) and prostate cancer death for the number of lymph nodes excised.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 65 years and median preoperative PSA was 6.6 ng/ml. At pathological evaluation 5,379 tumors (77%) were organ confined, 4,491 (65%) were Gleason score 5 to 6 and 2,027 (29%) were Gleason score 7 to 10. The median number of nodes obtained significantly decreased from 14 in 1987 to 1989 to 5 in 1999 to 2000 (p <0.001). Ten years after RRP Kaplan-Meier estimates were 63% of cases free of PSA progression, 95% free of systemic progression and 98% free of prostate cancer related death. Median followup was 5.9 years. After adjusting for pathological factors (PSA, grade, stage, margin status and surgical date) the number of lymph nodes obtained at lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with PSA progression (for each additional node (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02, p = 0.90), systemic progression (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.03, p = 0.68) or cause specific survival (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.06, p = 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: The extent of lymphadenectomy does not appear to affect prostate cancer outcome in lymph node negative cases. This includes patients with high preoperative PSA, high pathological grade and extracapsular disease. These results suggest that under staging is not present in apparently node negative cases with limited lymphadenectomy and, even if present, its impact on outcome is likely to be negligible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15758719     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155533.93528.4c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  34 in total

1.  Should all men having a radical prostatectomy have a pelvic lymph node dissection? No.

Authors:  Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Rodolphe Thuret; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schumacher; F C Burkhard; U E Studer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the efficacy of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Lu Yang; Xiao Lv; Siyuan Bu; Fan Wan; Shengqiang Qian; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Tianyong Fan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ilija Aleksic; Tyler Luthringer; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

5.  Prognostic impact of nodal relapse in definitive prostate-only irradiation.

Authors:  Mauro Loi; Luca Incrocci; Isacco Desideri; Pierluigi Bonomo; Beatrice Detti; Gabriele Simontacchi; Daniela Greto; Emanuela Olmetto; Giulio Francolini; Icro Meattini; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Sentinel node evaluation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramkishen Narayanan; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 7.  The survival benefit of lymph node dissection at the time of removal of kidney, prostate and urothelial carcinomas: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Angelika Borkowetz; Johannes Bruendl; Martin Drerup; Jonas Herrmann; Hendrik Isbarn; Burkhard Beyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Value of lymphadenectomy for limited nodal recurrence of prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent].

Authors:  I Wolff; M-O Grimm; M Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Extended lymph node dissection for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Jeschke; Fiona C Burkhard; Ramesh Thurairaja; Nivedita Dhar; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.