Literature DB >> 31115686

Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Zahra Ghasemahmad1, Saeid Farahani2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Even though many patients undergoing auditory steady-state response (ASSR) testing have some degree of hearing loss, some have normal hearing and ASSR often overestimates the behavioral thresholds in this group. In most commercial ASSR systems such as Chartr EP, a default correction factor is applied to compensate for this difference. Little is known, however, as how the correction factor compensates for the difference between ASSR and pure tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds as a function of carrier or modulation frequency (MF) in a commercial ASSR system. Our goal is to evaluate this relationship.
METHODS: Twenty-four normal hearing adults were examined for both PTA and ASSR (Chartr EP system, GN Otometrics). ASSR thresholds were obtained at three MFs (20, 40, and 80 Hz). The difference scores were obtained by subtracting PTA from ASSR thresholds at each frequency for each subject. The corrected ASSR thresholds, then, were compared with the PTA thresholds across MFs and carrier frequencies.
RESULTS: The default correction factors in the ASSR equipment differed significantly from the difference scores at all MFs and carrier frequencies (n = 24, p < 0.005). The correlation between corrected ASSR and PTA thresholds at most MFs and carrier frequencies were medium to poor.
CONCLUSIONS: At most MFs and carrier frequencies, the default correction factors defined by the manufacturer do not compensate for the difference between ASSR and PTA thresholds in normal hearing adults. The use of the default correction factors in Chartr EP system for the normal hearing adults needs special considerations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory steady-state response (ASSR); Correction factor; Difference score; Normal hearing adults; Pure tone audiometry (PTA)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31115686     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05451-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  28 in total

1.  Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; M Sasha John; Patricia Van Roon; David W Purcell; Julija Adamonis; Jodi Ostroff; Julian M Nedzelski; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Auditory brainstem response: recent developments in recording and analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; K A Rupp
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1997

3.  Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR): effects of modulation and carrier frequencies.

Authors:  Charles Petitot; Lionel Collett; John D Durrant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Anna Van Maanen; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate.

Authors:  Terence W Picton; Patricia van Roon; M Sasha John
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry.

Authors:  Fanny Scherf; Jan Brokx; Floris L Wuyts; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 8.  Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.

Authors:  D R Stapells; P Oates
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Barbara Cone-Wesson; Richard C Dowell; Dani Tomlin; Gary Rance; Wu Jia Ming
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Field Rickards
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Responses With Conventional Audiometry in Older Adults.

Authors:  Hadeel Y Tarawneh; Hamid R Sohrabi; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders; Ralph N Martins; Dona M P Jayakody
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.