Literature DB >> 12120716

Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials.

Gary Rance1, Field Rickards.   

Abstract

This retrospective study examines the relationship between auditory steady-state evoked potential (ASSEP) thresholds determined in infancy and subsequently obtained behavioral hearing levels in children with normal hearing or varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Overall, the results from 211 subjects showed that the two test techniques were highly correlated, with Pearson r values exceeding .95 at each of the audiometric test frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz. Analysis of the findings for babies with significant hearing loss (moderate to profound levels) showed similar threshold relationships to those obtained in previous studies involving adults and older children. The results for infants with normal or near-normal hearing did, however, differ from those reported for older subjects, with behavioral thresholds typically 10 to 15 dB better than would have been predicted from their ASSEP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  15 in total

1.  Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia M Dierking; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Carol Manning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].

Authors:  R Mühler; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

5.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

6.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemahmad; Saeid Farahani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Intra-operative monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation.

Authors:  John S Oghalai; Ross Tonini; Jamie Rasmus; Claudia Emery; Spiros Manolidis; Jeffrey T Vrabec; Joann Haymond
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2009-03

10.  Clinical comparison of the auditory steady-state response with the click auditory brainstem response in infants.

Authors:  Hyo Sook Lee; Joong Ho Ahn; Jong Woo Chung; Tae Hyun Yoon; Kwang-Sun Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.