Literature DB >> 19533262

Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.

Dror Lakstein1, David Backstein, Oleg Safir, Yona Kosashvili, Allan E Gross.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The ZMR porous stem is a modular cylindrical porous-coated femoral stem for revision THA. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of this stem at midterm followup. We prospectively reviewed 69 patients (72 femoral revisions) treated with the stem. The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in 61 (85%), periprosthetic fractures in five (7%), infection in three (4%), dislocation in two (3%), and fractured stem in one (1%). Minimum followup was 60 months (mean, 85 months; range, 60-114 months). The survival rate with revision for any reason as an end point was 93.8%. Mean preoperative Harris hip score was 39 points, and mean Harris hip score at last followup was 72 points. Four (5.5%) stems required rerevision, two (2.8%) for loosening, one (1.4%) for fracture at the modular junction, and one (1.4%) for infection. Subsidence occurred in eight (11%) patients, in the range of 5 to 25 mm. Two (2.89%) of the stems that subsided were symptomatic and progressive. The ZMR porous stem is a versatile system that offers a reliable fixation and an off-the-shelf solution for a multitude of femoral reconstruction challenges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19533262      PMCID: PMC2853670          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0937-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers.

Authors:  Matthew L Mroczkowski; Justin S Hertzler; Steven M Humphrey; Todd Johnson; Cheryl R Blanchard
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Early outcome of a modular femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael N Kang; James I Huddleston; Kathy Hwang; Susana Imrie; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery.

Authors:  A B Krishnamurthy; S J MacDonald; W G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis.

Authors:  R Grünig; E Morscher; P E Ochsner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems.

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Andrew Toms; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components.

Authors:  James P McAuley; C Anderson Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Complex revision total hip arthroplasty with modular stems at a mean of 14 years.

Authors:  Joseph C McCarthy; Jo-Ann Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures.

Authors:  D S Hungerford; L C Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders.

Authors:  A L Malkani; J J Settecerri; F H Sim; E Y Chao; S L Wallrichs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05
View more
  15 in total

1.  Digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction for assessing cementless hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic cohort study of 48 patients.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Dejin Yang; Shengjie Guo; Jing Tang; Jian Liu; Dacheng Wang; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Osteoblastic cell response on high-rough titanium coatings by cold spray.

Authors:  A M Vilardell; N Cinca; N Garcia-Giralt; S Dosta; I G Cano; X Nogués; J M Guilemany
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older.

Authors:  Ronak M Patel; Matthew C Smith; Chase C Woodward; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Modular femoral stems for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Magdalena Mashadi; Javad Parvizi; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Can machine learning models predict failure of revision total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Wayne Brian Cohen-Levy; Matthew Gerald Robinson; Jillian C Burns; Kyle Alpaugh; Ingwon Yeo; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with modular stems.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Jesus Fernandez-Lombardia; Jimena Llorens de los Rios; Ivan Perez-Coto; Susana Iglesias-Fernandez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?

Authors:  James I Huddleston; Matthew W Tetreault; Michael Yu; Hany Bedair; Viktor J Hansen; Ho-Rim Choi; Stuart B Goodman; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup.

Authors:  Andrew P Van Houwelingen; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Nelson V Greidanus; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Thomas Jalaguier; Florent Franck; Vincent Pibarot; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

Review 10.  Outcomes of dual modular cementless femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Ghoz; Matthew L Broadhead; John Morley; Shawn Tavares; David McDonald
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.