Literature DB >> 9128770

Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis.

R Grünig1, E Morscher, P E Ochsner.   

Abstract

Between 1988 and 1991, 40 Wagner SL femoral revision stems were implanted at the Orthopaedic Departments of the University of Basel and of the Kantonsspital Liestal, Switzerland. The indications were: 27 cases of extensive bone resorption and destruction of the proximal prosthetic bed, seven periprosthetic fractures, two Girdle-stone situations after removal of infected total hip arthroplasty (THA), 1 case each of primary arthroplasty for congenital dysplasia of the hip, failed osteosynthesis of a pertrochanteric fracture, subtrochanteric femoral fracture and femoral fracture with subsequent osteomyelitis. The average follow-up time was 47 months. The average age of the patients was 70 years (range 37-85 years). The average preoperative hip score was 32 points, postoperative 78 points. We noted to severe complications such as thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or nerve injury. No case of early infection has occurred to date. Four hips required further revision, one after a haematogenous infection of the prosthesis 2 years after implantation, one 4 weeks after surgery because of a stem which was significantly undersized compared with the medullary canal of the femur. Two hips were revised after 3 and 4 years, respectively, for continuous subsidence and loosening in the medullary canal. Both revisions were successfully achieved using a femoral component of larger diameter. We recommend the Wagner SL femoral revision stem, not as a routine procedure to treat loosening, but for patients with severe femoral bone resorption after THA or periprosthetic fractures, those in the Girdlestone situation and geriatric patients with pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128770     DOI: 10.1007/bf00393708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  19 in total

1.  Long-term results of the Wagner cone prosthesis.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Annemarie Schraml; Gerd Hohenberger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular tapered stem.

Authors:  Christophe Pattyn; Alexander Mulliez; René Verdonk; Emmanuel Audenaert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Stem and osteotomy length are critical for success of the transfemoral approach and cementless stem revision.

Authors:  Daniel F A de Menezes; Pierre Le Béguec; Hans-Peter Sieber; Mathias Goldschild
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M D Schofer; T Efe; T J Heyse; N Timmesfeld; R Velte; F Hinrichs; J Schmitt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of 14 patients by CT.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Fredrik Strömwall; Mats O Beckman; Karl A Hansson; André Stark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [The prosthesis nail -- a new stable fixation device for periprosthetic fractures and critical fractures of the proximal femur].

Authors:  A Probst; T Schneider; S Hankemeier; E Brug
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: modularity of neck and metaphyseal components].

Authors:  G Köster; T A Walde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.

Authors:  Quoqiang Zhang; Stuart B Goodman; William J Maloney; James I Huddleston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.