Literature DB >> 16435360

Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers.

Matthew L Mroczkowski1, Justin S Hertzler, Steven M Humphrey, Todd Johnson, Cheryl R Blanchard.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the effect of assembly load and local assembly environmental conditions on the fretting corrosion of modular femoral stem tapers. Femoral head/taper assemblies in both similar (CoCrMo/CoCrMo) and mixed (CoCrMo/Ti-6Al-4V) alloy combinations were evaluated using an electrochemical test method. Specimens were assembled under impact loading and by hand, in both wet and dry conditions. Incremental cyclic loads ranging from 89 to 5,340 N were applied at a frequency of 3 Hz in Ringer's solution at ambient temperature. During the test, both the open circuit potential (OCP) and fretting current (i(fret)) were measured using a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and counter electrode, respectively. The results were comparable for both mixed and similar alloy couples. Decreases in OCP and increases in i(fret) (indicators of oxide film fracture and repassivation) were seen with increasing load magnitude, often occurring at loads well below those expected clinically. OCP at the 5,340 N cyclic load ranged from -30.4 to -103.7 mV versus SCE for similar alloy couples, and -19.1 to -181.4 mV versus SCE for mixed alloy couples. Mean peak fretting currents ranged from 0.84 to 1.42 microA and 1.06 to 3.12 microA for similar and mixed alloy couples, respectively. The larger current magnitudes and more negative shifts in OCP for mixed alloy couples indicate the difference in oxide film fracture behavior between titanium and cobalt alloys. The load at which OCP began to drop (onset of fretting) was dependent upon the assembly conditions for both material couples. Specimens assembled with impact loads in air showed the highest resistance to fretting. The results of this study indicate that the assembly load and the environment both play a role in the initial stability of modular hip taper connections. (c) 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16435360     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  19 in total

1.  Does Taper Angle Clearance Influence Fretting and Corrosion Damage at the Head-Stem Interface? A Matched Cohort Retrieval Study.

Authors:  Sevi B Kocagöz; Richard J Underwood; Shiril Sivan; Jeremy L Gilbert; Daniel W Macdonald; Judd S Day; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-01

2.  Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H John Cooper; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Matthew Tetreault; Wayne G Paprosky; Scott M Sporer; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Philippe Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz; Michael Krachler; Marc Thomsen; Christian Heisel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Properties and Corrosion Performance of Self-reinforced Composite PEEK for Proposed Use as a Modular Taper Gasket.

Authors:  Eric S Ouellette; Jeremy L Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Review: Trunnionosis leading to modular femoral head dissociation.

Authors:  Agneish Dutta; James Nutt; Guy Slater; Syed Ahmed
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 7.  Head-neck taper corrosion in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Hussenbocus; D Kosuge; L B Solomon; D W Howie; R H Oskouei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Large-diameter total hip arthroplasty modular heads require greater assembly forces for initial stability.

Authors:  A R MacLeod; N P T Sullivan; M R Whitehouse; H S Gill
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Do ceramic femoral heads reduce taper fretting corrosion in hip arthroplasty? A retrieval study.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Sevi B Kocagöz; Josa A Hanzlik; Richard J Underwood; Jeremy L Gilbert; Daniel W MacDonald; Gwo-Chin Lee; Michael A Mont; Matthew J Kraay; Gregg R Klein; Javad Parvizi; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Quantification of the Contact Area at the Head-Stem Taper Interface of Modular Hip Prostheses.

Authors:  Florian Witt; Julian Gührs; Michael M Morlock; Nicholas E Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.