Literature DB >> 31019942

Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Hervé Ouanezar1, Thomas Jalaguier1, Florent Franck1, Vincent Pibarot1, Hugo Bothorel2, Mo Saffarini2, Jean-Pierre Piton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modular stems have been widely studied as they allow intraoperative adjustments (offset, anteversion, limb length) to better restore hip biomechanics. Many authors reported outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using modular stems with metaphyseal-diaphyseal junctions, however, little is known about modular neck femoral stems (MNFS) with metaphyseal-epiphyseal junctions. We therefore aimed to report outcomes and implant survival of a MNFS in a consecutive series of revision THA at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 28 revision THAs performed between February 2010 and March 2012 using an uncemented MNFS. The final study cohort included 25 patients living with their original components, at a mean follow-up of 68.4±7.4 months and aged 67.7±11.6 years at index operation.
RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 39.1±19.2 pre-operatively to 78.1±18.3 post-operatively, and the Postel Merle d'Aubigné score (PMA) improved from 9.8±3.0 pre-operatively to 14.8±2.8 post-operatively. The postoperative limb length discrepancy (LLD) was >10 mm in 18% of the hips. There were no significant differences of femoral offset and neck shaft angle (NSA) between operated and contralateral hips. Two hips (8.0%) showed new periprosthetic radiolucent lines. Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) occurred in 3 hips (12%). No subluxations, dislocations or implant breakages were reported. One revision (3.6%) was performed with retrieval of the revision stem for infection. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival at 5 years, using stem revision as endpoint, was 96.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Optimal® MNFS provided a satisfactory survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years, with no noticeable adverse effects resulting from the additional modular junction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Revision total hip arthroplasty (revision THA); clinical and radiographic outcome; implant survival; modular neck; modular stem

Year:  2019        PMID: 31019942      PMCID: PMC6462653          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.01.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  52 in total

Review 1.  A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR.

Authors:  D C Wirtz; K D Heller; U Holzwarth; C Siebert; R P Pitto; G Zeiler; B A Blencke; R Forst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years.

Authors:  Douglas P McInnis; Geoffrey Horne; Peter A Devane
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Early outcome of a modular femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael N Kang; James I Huddleston; Kathy Hwang; Susana Imrie; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Success rate of modular component exchange for the treatment of an unstable total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark D Earll; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason; Thomas McCoy; Susan Odum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Modular component exchange for treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement in selected patients.

Authors:  S D Toomey; R H Hopper; J P McAuley; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Louis M Kwong; A John Miller; Phillipp Lubinus
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  Bassam A Masri; R M Dominic Meek; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Stefanie Werber; Ulrich Holzwarth; Günther Zeiler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting after total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yingjie Wang; Qi Yang; Jin Lin; Wenwei Qian; Jin Jin; Peng Gao; Baozhong Zhang; Bin Feng; Xisheng Weng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.