Literature DB >> 15577492

Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems.

Scott M Sporer1, Wayne G Paprosky.   

Abstract

Considerable femoral bone loss can be encountered in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty patient. Deficient proximal bone requires either a bulk allograft or a femoral component that allows stable distal fixation. Extensively coated stems have shown excellent results for many revisions but have shown higher rates of failure among patients with femoral remodeling in retroversion, an enlarged endosteal diameter, or an ectatic canal. A modular tapered stem is an alternative in this subset of patients. A modular tapered implant provides axial and rotational stability through the use of distal splines, and the proximal body segments can allow independent adjustment of leg length, offset, and anteversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15577492     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150120.80409.0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

1.  Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.

Authors:  Min Zeng; Jie Xie; Mingqing Li; Shaoru Lin; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Christoph Thaler; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty in advanced tuberculosis of the hip.

Authors:  Min Zeng; Yihe Hu; Yi Leng; Jie Xie; Long Wang; Mingqing Li; Jianxi Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; George C Babis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

Review 5.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Management of femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saradej Khuangsirikul; Thanainit Chotanaphuti
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

7.  Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of 14 patients by CT.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Fredrik Strömwall; Mats O Beckman; Karl A Hansson; André Stark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.