Literature DB >> 19526267

Otoacoustic emission theories and behavioral estimates of human basilar membrane motion are mutually consistent.

Enrique A Lopez-Poveda1, Peter T Johannesen.   

Abstract

When two pure tones (or primaries) of slightly different frequencies (f (1) and f (2)) are presented to the ear, new frequency components are generated by nonlinear interaction of the primaries within the cochlea. These new components can be recorded in the ear canal as otoacoustic emissions (OAE). The level of the 2f (1)-f (2) OAE component is known as the distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and is regarded as an indicator of the physiological state of the cochlea. The current view is that maximal level DPOAEs occur for primaries that produce equal excitation at the f (2) cochlear region, but this notion cannot be directly tested in living humans because it is impossible to record their cochlear responses while monitoring their ear canal DPOAE levels. On the other hand, it has been claimed that the temporal masking curve (TMC) method of inferring human basilar membrane responses allows measurement of the levels of equally effective pure tones at any given cochlear site. The assumptions of this behavioral method, however, lack firm physiological support in humans. Here, the TMC method was applied to test the current notion on the conditions that maximize DPOAE levels in humans. DPOAE and TMC results were mutually consistent for frequencies of 1 and 4 kHz and for levels below around 65 dB sound pressure level. This match supports the current view on the generation of maximal level DPOAEs as well as the assumptions of the behavioral TMC method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19526267      PMCID: PMC2774409          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0176-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  42 in total

1.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and basilar membrane vibration in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; B C Moore; D A Vickers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.

Authors:  N J He; R A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; B B Stagner; M J McCoy; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

2.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Behavioral estimates of the contribution of inner and outer hair cell dysfunction to individualized audiometric loss.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-24

4.  Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.

Authors:  Patricia Pérez-González; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Across-frequency behavioral estimates of the contribution of inner and outer hair cell dysfunction to individualized audiometric loss.

Authors:  Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.