Literature DB >> 8270742

Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.

N J He1, R A Schmiedt.   

Abstract

The fine frequency structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product (ADP fine structure) was examined in ten human subjects with normal hearing. Primary frequencies (f1 and f2) were incremented in steps of 1/32 octave with an f2/f1 ratio of 1.2. The primary levels were kept equal to each other and varied from 45 to 65 dB SPL in 2.5-dB steps. The results show that the ADP fine structure is characterized by a series of peaks and valleys across frequency, with a peak-to-peak frequency spacing of about 3/32 octave and a peak-to-valley amplitude ratio of up to 20 dB. At frequencies below 4000 Hz, as primary level increases, the sharpness of the ADP fine structure is not significantly reduced and the pattern gradually shifts to lower frequencies. At frequencies above 4000 Hz, a flattening of the pattern is sometimes observed at high levels. A consequence of the underlying process responsible for the fine structure is that ADP input/output (I/O) functions can be highly variable in shape. Dramatic shape changes can occur for ADP I/O functions obtained with primary frequency changes of as little as 1/32nd of an octave. The outward cause of I/O function variability is the behavior of the ADP fine structure with level; i.e., it remains robust at high levels and systematically shifts to lower frequencies with level. As a result, ADP peaks can shift to valleys with increasing level and vice versa. Thus, small shifts in primary frequency can result in significant changes in the shape of the ADP I/O function in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8270742     DOI: 10.1121/1.407350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cisplatin ototoxicity and otoprotection with sodium salicylate.

Authors:  Miguel Angelo Hyppolito; José Antonio A de Oliveira; Maria Rossato
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B J Ceranic; D K Prasher; E Raglan; L M Luxon
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure.

Authors:  J Heitmann; B Waldmann; P K Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Sources of variability in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.