Literature DB >> 14678571

Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures.

Matti Uhari1, Marjo Renko, Hannu Soini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lectures are good for presenting information and providing explanations, but because they lack active participation they have been neglected.
METHODS: Students' experiences were evaluated after exposing them to the use of voting during lectures in their paediatrics course. Questions were delivered to the students taking paediatrics course. Thirty-six students out of the total of 40 (90%) attended the opening lecture, at which the first survey concerning previous experiences of lectures was performed. Thirty-nine students (98%) answered the second series of questions at the end of the paediatrics course.
RESULTS: Most of the students felt that voting improved their activity during lectures, enhanced their learning, and that it was easier to make questions during lectures than earlier.
CONCLUSIONS: The students gained new, exciting insights much more often during the paediatrics course than before. We as teachers found that voting during lectures could easily overcome some of the obstacles of good lecturing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14678571      PMCID: PMC317338          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-3-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Educ        ISSN: 1472-6920            Impact factor:   2.463


  6 in total

1.  A schematic approach to diagnosing and resolving lecturalgia.

Authors:  K McLaughlin; H Mandin
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers.

Authors:  George Brown; Michael Manogue
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Peer consultation as a method for promoting problem-based learning during a paediatrics course.

Authors:  Marjo Renko; Matti Uhari; Hannu Soini; Marianne Tensing
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  How to: Construct and Use a Problem-based Programmed Lecture.

Authors:  B Joorabchi
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  A novel extension of problem-based learning: problem-based lecture presentation by students.

Authors:  G Georgiev; C Macpherson; P J Rooney
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  The challenge of "teaching" large groups of learners: strategies to increase active participation and learning.

Authors:  D W Nierenberg
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.210

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  The effectiveness of a scientific symposium to change urologists' attitude towards treatment of LUTS/BPH.

Authors:  Dionisios Mitropoulos; George Moutzouris; Vaios Papadimitriou; Petros Perimenis; Frank Sofras
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Evan Robinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Esther P Black; Jürgen Rohr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Impact of a student response system on short- and long-term learning in a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Flora C Liu; Jacob P Gettig; Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Medical school hotline: harnessing technology for a 21st century medical education.

Authors:  Joseph W Turban
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-04

6.  Seven tips for giving an engaging and memorable presentation.

Authors:  C L Mai; R D Minehart; M C Pian-Smith
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-07-05

7.  Role of an audience response system in didactic attendance and assessment.

Authors:  Lisa R Stoneking; Kristi H Grall; Alice Min; Bradley Dreifuss; Karen C Spear Ellinwood
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-06

8.  Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fahad Alharbi; Khulud F Alazmi; Bashar R El Momani; Lubna Al-Muzian; Mark Wertheimer; Anas Almukhtar; Mohammed Almuzian
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Review, historical context, and clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA stroke trials exclusion criteria: Part 1: rapidly improving stroke symptoms.

Authors:  Steven R Levine; Pooja Khatri; Joseph P Broderick; James C Grotta; Scott E Kasner; Doojin Kim; Brett C Meyer; Peter Panagos; Jose Romano; Phillip Scott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  The use of innovative cost-saving audience response system in orthodontic case-based learning: A potential approach in distance learning.

Authors:  Khadijah A Turkistani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2021-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.