Literature DB >> 19507979

Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences.

Rachel M Theodore1, Joanne L Miller, David DeSteno.   

Abstract

Previous research indicates that talkers differ in phonetically relevant properties of speech, including voice-onset-time (VOT) in word-initial stop consonants; some talkers have characteristically shorter VOTs than others. Previous research also indicates that VOT is robustly affected by contextual influences, including speaking rate and place of articulation. This paper examines whether these contextual influences on VOT are themselves talker-specific. Many tokens of alveolar ti (experiment 1) or labial pi and velar ki (experiment 2) were elicited from talkers across a range of rates. VOT and vowel duration (a metric of rate) were measured for each token. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses showed that (1) VOT increased as rate decreased for all talkers, but the magnitude of the increase varied significantly across talkers; thus the effect of rate on VOT was talker-specific; (2) the talker-specific effect of rate was stable across a change in place of articulation; and (3) for all talkers VOTs were shorter for labial than velar stops, and there was no significant variability in the magnitude of this displacement across talkers; thus the effect of place on VOT was not talker-specific. The implications of these findings for how listeners might accommodate talker differences in VOT during speech perception are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19507979      PMCID: PMC2806434          DOI: 10.1121/1.3106131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Patterns of orofacial movement velocity across variations in speech rate.

Authors:  M D McClean
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Authors:  J Sean Allen; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database.

Authors:  D Byrd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.

Authors:  L E Volaitis; J L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

7.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.

Authors:  J L Miller; L E Volaitis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-12

9.  Perception of reading rate by speakers and listeners.

Authors:  H Lane; F Grosjean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-02

10.  Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration.

Authors:  R F Port; R Rotunno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

4.  Contextual Influences on Phonetic Categorization in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Jean A Campbell; Heather L McSherry; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-19

5.  Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

6.  A second chance for a first impression: Sensitivity to cumulative input statistics for lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Lynne C Nygaard; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-14

7.  Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Julie Case; Scott Seyfarth; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Attention modulates specificity effects in spoken word recognition: Challenges to the time-course hypothesis.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Sheila E Blumstein; Sahil Luthra
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Nicholas R Monto
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.