Literature DB >> 19505827

Influence of visual scene velocity on segmental kinematics during stance.

Kalpana Dokka1, Robert V Kenyon, Emily A Keshner.   

Abstract

We investigated how the velocity of anterior-posterior movement of a visual surround affected segmental kinematics during stance. Ten healthy young adults were exposed to sinusoidal oscillation of an immersive virtual scene at five peak velocities ranging from 1.2 to 188 cm/s at each of four frequencies: 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.55 Hz. Root mean square (RMS) values of head, trunk, thigh and shank angular displacements were calculated. RMS values of head-neck, hip, knee and ankle joint angles were also calculated. RMS values of head, trunk, thigh and shank displacements exhibited significant increases at a scene velocity of 188 cm/s when compared with lower scene velocities. RMS values of hip, knee and ankle joint angles exhibited significant increases at scene velocities of 125 and 188 cm/s when compared with lower scene velocities. These results suggest that visual cues continued to drive postural adjustments even during high velocity movement of the virtual scene. Significant increases in the RMS values of the lower-limb joint angles suggest that as visually-induced postural instability increased, the body was primarily controlled as a multi-segmental structure instead of a single-link inverted pendulum, with the knee playing a key role in postural stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19505827      PMCID: PMC2705688          DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  19 in total

1.  The influence of dynamic visual environments on postural sway in the elderly.

Authors:  L L Borger; S L Whitney; M S Redfern; J M Furman
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses.

Authors:  E A Keshner; R V Kenyon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Effects of characteristics of image quality in an immersive environment.

Authors:  Henry Been-Lirn Duh; James J W Lin; Robert V Kenyon; Donald E Parker; Thomas A Furness
Journal:  Presence (Camb)       Date:  2002-06

4.  The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance.

Authors:  Yuanfen Zhang; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Strategies for the prevention and management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.

Authors:  J W J Bijlsma; K Knahr
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Field of view and base of support width influence postural responses to visual stimuli during quiet stance.

Authors:  Jefferson W Streepey; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Postural coordination in looking and tracking tasks.

Authors:  Olivier Oullier; Benoît G Bardy; Thomas A Stoffregen; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements.

Authors:  L H Zupan; D M Merfeld; C Darlot
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The influence of knee rigidity on balance corrections: a comparison with responses of cerebellar ataxia patients.

Authors:  L B Oude Nijhuis; J Hegeman; M Bakker; M Van Meel; B R Bloem; J H J Allum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vection increases the magnitude and accuracy of visually evoked postural responses.

Authors:  A E I Thurrell; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The uncertainty associated with visual flow fields and their influence on postural sway: Weber's law suffices to explain the nonlinearity of vection.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Ian H Stevenson; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Benoît Fourre; Nicolas Vuillerme; Guillaume Giraudet; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of sub-threshold vibratory noise on visuomotor entrainment during human walking and standing in a virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Samuel A Acuña; John D Zunker; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Self versus environment motion in postural control.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Contribution of vision to postural behaviors during continuous support-surface translations.

Authors:  D Joseph Jilk; Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential contributions of vision, touch and muscle proprioception to the coding of hand movements.

Authors:  Caroline Blanchard; Régine Roll; Jean-Pierre Roll; Anne Kavounoudias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Compensatory Postural Adjustments in an Oculus Virtual Reality Environment and the Risk of Falling in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Miguel F Gago; Darya Yelshyna; Estela Bicho; Hélder David Silva; Luís Rocha; Maria Lurdes Rodrigues; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2016-06-25

9.  Visually induced postural reactivity is velocity-dependent at low temporal frequencies and frequency-dependent at high temporal frequencies.

Authors:  J-M Hanssens; R Allard; G Giraudet; J Faubert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Calibration of the Leg Muscle Responses Elicited by Predictable Perturbations of Stance and the Effect of Vision.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.