Literature DB >> 24132526

Contribution of vision to postural behaviors during continuous support-surface translations.

D Joseph Jilk1, Seyed A Safavynia, Lena H Ting.   

Abstract

During standing balance, kinematics of postural behaviors have been previously observed to change across visual conditions, perturbation amplitudes, or perturbation frequencies. However, experimental limitations only allowed for independent investigation of such parameters. Here, we adapted a pseudorandom ternary sequence (PRTS) perturbation previously used in rotational support-surface perturbations (Peterka in J Neurophysiol 88(3):1097-1118, 2002) to a translational paradigm, allowing us to concurrently examine the effects of vision, perturbation amplitude, and frequency on balance control. Additionally, the unpredictable PRTS perturbation eliminated effects of feedforward adaptations typical of responses to sinusoidal stimuli. The PRTS perturbation contained a wide spectral bandwidth (0.08-3.67 Hz) and was scaled to 4 different peak-to-peak amplitudes (3-24 cm). Root mean square (RMS) of hip displacement and velocity increased relative to RMS ankle displacement and velocity in the absence of vision across all subjects, especially at higher perturbation amplitudes. Gain and phase lag of center of mass (CoM) sway relative to the perturbation also increased with perturbation frequency; phase lag further increased when vision was absent. Together, our results suggest that visual input, perturbation amplitude, and perturbation frequency can concurrently and independently modulate postural strategies during standing balance. Moreover, each factor contributes to the difficulty of maintaining postural stability; increased difficulty evokes a greater reliance on hip motion. Finally, despite high degrees of joint angle variation across subjects, CoM measures were relatively similar across subjects, suggesting that the CoM is an important controlled variable for balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132526      PMCID: PMC4065169          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3729-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

1.  Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture?

Authors:  J J Buchanan; F B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Head-trunk coordination during linear anterior-posterior translations.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Multisensory fusion: simultaneous re-weighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture.

Authors:  Kelvin S Oie; Tim Kiemel; John J Jeka
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

4.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Muscle modes during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: effect of instability and additional support.

Authors:  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy; Mark L Latash; John P Scholz; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensorimotor feedback based on task-relevant error robustly predicts temporal recruitment and multidirectional tuning of muscle synergies.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The role of vision in the control of posture during linear motion.

Authors:  A Berthoz; M Lacour; J F Soechting; P P Vidal
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Stabilization of human posture during induced oscillations of the body.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; W Bruzek; H Selinka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits.

Authors:  L M Nashner; F O Black; C Wall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Do perturbation-evoked responses result in higher reaction time costs depending on the direction and magnitude of perturbation?

Authors:  Keaton A Inkol; Andrew H Huntley; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modeling of muscle forces in humans with and without temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; H Liu; Y M Gonzalez; D B Marx; J C Nickel
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Reorganization of motor modules for standing reactive balance recovery following pyridoxine-induced large-fiber peripheral sensory neuropathy in cats.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Andrew Sawers; Jessica L Allen; Paul J Stapley; Jane M Macpherson; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Descending Influences on Vestibulospinal and Vestibulosympathetic Reflexes.

Authors:  Andrew A McCall; Derek M Miller; Bill J Yates
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 5.  Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Camille Dubé; Yu Jin; Brienne G Powers; Ginny Li; Amélie Labelle; Meghan S Rivers; Ivy M Gumboc; André E Bussières
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 1.614

6.  Higher Balance Task Demands are Associated with an Increase in Individual Alpha Peak Frequency.

Authors:  Thorben Hülsdünker; Andreas Mierau; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Calibration of the Leg Muscle Responses Elicited by Predictable Perturbations of Stance and the Effect of Vision.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.