Literature DB >> 21131564

The uncertainty associated with visual flow fields and their influence on postural sway: Weber's law suffices to explain the nonlinearity of vection.

Kunlin Wei1, Ian H Stevenson, Konrad P Körding.   

Abstract

When we stand upright, we integrate cues from multiple senses, such as vision and proprioception, to maintain and regulate our vertical posture. How these cues are combined has been the focus of a range of studies. These studies generally measured how subjects deviate from standing upright when confronted with a moving visual stimulus displayed in a virtual environment. Previous research had shown that uncertainty is central in such cue combination problems. Here we wanted to understand, quantitatively, how visual flow fields and uncertainty about them affect human posture. To do so, we combined experimental methods from perceptual psychophysics with methods from motor control studies. We used a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm to measure uncertainty as a function of the magnitude of a random-dot flow field and stimulus coherence. We subsequently measured movement amplitude as a function of visual stimulus parameters. In line with previous research, we find that sensorimotor behavior depends nonlinearly on the stimulus amplitude and, importantly, is affected by uncertainty. We find that this nonlinearity and uncertainty dependence is accurately predicted by standard Bayesian cue combination. Importantly, a Weber's law where visual uncertainty depends on stimulus amplitude is enough to explain the nonlinear behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21131564      PMCID: PMC3415039          DOI: 10.1167/10.14.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Nonlinear postural control in response to visual translation.

Authors:  Elena Ravaioli; Kelvin S Oie; Tim Kiemel; Lorenzo Chiari; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Asymptotic theory of information-theoretic experimental design.

Authors:  Liam Paninski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Temporal stability of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment.

Authors:  T M Dijkstra; G Schöner; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Development of cortical responses to optic flow.

Authors:  Rick O Gilmore; C Hou; M W Pettet; A M Norcia
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway.

Authors:  R J Peterka; M S Benolken
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Optimal compensation for temporal uncertainty in movement planning.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  14 in total

1.  Generalization of unconstrained reaching with hand-weight changes.

Authors:  Xiang Yan; Qining Wang; Zhengchuan Lu; Ian H Stevenson; Konrad Körding; Kunlin Wei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Decreasing perceived optic flow rigidity increases postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Stella F Donker; Frans A J Verstraten; Maarten J van der Smagt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Static and dynamic visual cues in feed-forward postural control.

Authors:  Sambit Mohapatra; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

5.  Chaos in balance: non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion.

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; Fintan Nagle; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Self-motion sensitivity to visual yaw rotations in humans.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Karl A Beykirch; Paolo Pretto; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

9.  Optic flow detection is not influenced by visual-vestibular congruency.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A computational model for driver's cognitive state, visual perception and intermittent attention in a distracted car following task.

Authors:  Jami Pekkanen; Otto Lappi; Paavo Rinkkala; Samuel Tuhkanen; Roosa Frantsi; Heikki Summala
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.