Literature DB >> 12068787

Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements.

L H Zupan1, D M Merfeld, C Darlot.   

Abstract

The sensory weighting model is a general model of sensory integration that consists of three processing layers. First, each sensor provides the central nervous system (CNS) with information regarding a specific physical variable. Due to sensor dynamics, this measure is only reliable for the frequency range over which the sensor is accurate. Therefore, we hypothesize that the CNS improves on the reliability of the individual sensor outside this frequency range by using information from other sensors, a process referred to as "frequency completion." Frequency completion uses internal models of sensory dynamics. This "improved" sensory signal is designated as the "sensory estimate" of the physical variable. Second, before being combined, information with different physical meanings is first transformed into a common representation; sensory estimates are converted to intermediate estimates. This conversion uses internal models of body dynamics and physical relationships. Third, several sensory systems may provide information about the same physical variable (e.g., semicircular canals and vision both measure self-rotation). Therefore, we hypothesize that the "central estimate" of a physical variable is computed as a weighted sum of all available intermediate estimates of this physical variable, a process referred to as "multicue weighted averaging." The resulting central estimate is fed back to the first two layers. The sensory weighting model is applied to three-dimensional (3D) visual-vestibular interactions and their associated eye movements and perceptual responses. The model inputs are 3D angular and translational stimuli. The sensory inputs are the 3D sensory signals coming from the semicircular canals, otolith organs, and the visual system. The angular and translational components of visual movement are assumed to be available as separate stimuli measured by the visual system using retinal slip and image deformation. In addition, both tonic ("regular") and phasic ("irregular") otolithic afferents are implemented. Whereas neither tonic nor phasic otolithic afferents distinguish gravity from linear acceleration, the model uses tonic afferents to estimate gravity and phasic afferents to estimate linear acceleration. The model outputs are the internal estimates of physical motion variables and 3D slow-phase eye movements. The model also includes a smooth pursuit module. The model matches eye responses and perceptual effects measured during various motion paradigms in darkness (e.g., centered and eccentric yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis, yaw rotation about an earth-horizontal axis) and with visual cues (e.g., stabilized visual stimulation or optokinetic stimulation).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12068787     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-001-0290-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  81 in total

1.  Vestibular, optokinetic, and cognitive contribution to the guidance of passive self-rotation toward instructed targets.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Grigorios Nasios; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A distributed, dynamic, parallel computational model: the role of noise in velocity storage.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Canal-otolith interactions and detection thresholds of linear and angular components during curved-path self-motion.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Learning to balance on one leg: motor strategy and sensory weighting.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Marloes van Leeuwen; Gert S Faber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of linear vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans during eccentric rotation while facing downwards.

Authors:  Takao Imai; Yasumitsu Takimoto; Noriaki Takeda; Tomoko Okumura; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

Review 10.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.