Literature DB >> 11354434

The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses.

E A Keshner1, R V Kenyon.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of a 3-dimensional stereoscopic scene on segmental stabilization. Eight subjects participated in static sway and locomotion experiments with a visual scene that moved sinusoidally or at constant velocity about the pitch or roll axes. Segmental displacements, Fast Fourier Transforms, and Root Mean Square values were calculated. In both pitch and roll, subjects exhibited greater magnitudes of motion in head and trunk than ankle. Smaller amplitudes and frequent phase reversals suggested control of the ankle by segmental proprioceptive inputs and ground reaction forces rather than by the visual-vestibular signals. Postural controllers may set limits of motion at each body segment rather than be governed solely by a perception of the visual vertical. Two locomotor strategies were also exhibited, implying that some subjects could override the effect of the roll axis optic flow field. Our results demonstrate task dependent differences that argue against using static postural responses to moving visual fields when assessing more dynamic tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11354434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  28 in total

1.  Exposure to a rotating virtual environment during treadmill locomotion causes adaptation in heading direction.

Authors:  A P Mulavara; J T Richards; T Ruttley; A Marshburn; Y Nomura; J J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The interplay between strategic and adaptive control mechanisms in plastic recalibration of locomotor function.

Authors:  Jason T Richards; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gait deviations induced by visual stimulation in roll.

Authors:  Erich Schneider; Klaus Jahn; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt; Michael Strupp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects.

Authors:  E A Keshner; Y Dhaher
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A shared neural integrator for human posture control.

Authors:  S E Haggerty; A R Wu; K H Sienko; A D Kuo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor learning principles.

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Patrice L Weiss; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-09-11

9.  Visual control of trunk translation and orientation during locomotion.

Authors:  E Anson; P Agada; T Kiemel; Y Ivanenko; F Lacquaniti; J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Self versus environment motion in postural control.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.