Literature DB >> 1949630

Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors.

R L De Valois1, K K De Valois.   

Abstract

We examined the ability of observers to determine the vertical alignment of three Gabor patches (cosine gratings tapered in X and Y by Gaussians) when the grating within the middle patch was moving right or left. The comparison patches were flickered in counterphase, as was the test patch in a control condition. In all conditions, the Gabor patch itself (the envelope) was stationary. Vernier acuity (i.e. sensitivity) was almost as good with the moving as with the flickering Gabors, but there was a very pronounced positional bias in the case of the patterns in which the internal gratings were moving. The (stationary) patches appeared to be displaced in the direction of the grating movement. Thus if the grating were drifting rightwards, the observer would see the patches as being aligned only when the test patch position in fact was shifted far over to the left. This movement-related bias increased rapidly with retinal eccentricity, reaching 15 min at 8 deg eccentricity. The bias was greatest at 4-8 Hz temporal frequency, and at low spatial frequencies. Whether the patterns were on the horizontal or the vertical meridian was largely irrelevant, but larger biases were found with patterns moving towards or away from the fovea than with those moving in a tangential direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1949630     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90138-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  72 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system.

Authors:  A Hayes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motion-induced illusory displacement reexamined: differences between perception and action?

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Spatially asymmetric response to moving patterns in the visual cortex: re-examining the local sign hypothesis.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.