Literature DB >> 22080448

A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Taiki Fukiage1, David Whitney, Ikuya Murakami.   

Abstract

The flash-drag (FDE) effect refers to the phenomenon in which the position of a stationary flashed object in one location appears shifted in the direction of nearby motion. Over the past decade, it has been debated how bottom-up and top-down processes contribute to this illusion. In this study, we demonstrate that randomly phase-shifting gratings can produce the FDE. In the random motion sequence we used, the FDE inducer (a sinusoidal grating) jumped to a random phase every 125 ms and stood still until the next jump. Because this random sequence could not be tracked attentively, it was impossible for the observer to discern the jump direction at the time of the flash. By sorting the data based on the flash's onset time relative to each jump time in the random motion sequence, we found that a large FDE with a broad temporal tuning occurred around 50 to 150 ms before the jump and that this effect was not correlated with any other jumps in the past or future. These results suggest that as few as two frames of unpredictable apparent motion can preattentively cause the FDE with a broad temporal tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22080448      PMCID: PMC3627737          DOI: 10.1167/11.13.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  34 in total

1.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; P Cavanagh; A T Labianca
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A flash-lag effect in random motion.

Authors:  I Murakami
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The duration of 3-d form analysis in transformational apparent motion.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

4.  The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure.

Authors:  I Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceived shifts of flashed stimuli by visible and invisible object motion.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Takashi R Sato; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Motion drag induced by global motion Gabor arrays.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe; Alan Johnston
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Where is the moving object now? Judgments of instantaneous position show poor temporal precision (SD = 70 ms).

Authors:  Daniel Linares; Alex O Holcombe; Alex L White
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Simple differential latencies modulate, but do not cause the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Yolanda Ong; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

1.  The flash grab effect.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A dynamic noise background reveals perceptual motion extrapolation: The twinkle-goes illusion.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.