Literature DB >> 22302116

The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Gerrit W Maus1, Jamie Ward, Romi Nijhawan, David Whitney.   

Abstract

How does the visual system assign the perceived position of a moving object? This question is surprisingly complex, since sluggish responses of photoreceptors and transmission delays along the visual pathway mean that visual cortex does not have immediate information about a moving object's position. In the flash-lag effect (FLE), a moving object is perceived ahead of an aligned flash. Psychophysical work on this illusion has inspired models for visual localization of moving objects. However, little is known about the underlying neural mechanisms. Here, we investigated the role of neural activity in areas MT+ and V1/V2 in localizing moving objects. Using short trains of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) or single pulses at different time points, we measured the influence of TMS on the perceived location of a moving object. We found that TMS delivered to MT+ significantly reduced the FLE; single pulse timings revealed a broad temporal tuning with maximum effect for TMS pulses, 200 ms after the flash. Stimulation of V1/V2 did not significantly influence perceived position. Our results demonstrate that area MT+ contributes to the perceptual localization of moving objects and is involved in the integration of position information over a long time window.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302116      PMCID: PMC3513962          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  53 in total

1.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.

Authors:  B Krekelberg; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A flash-lag effect in random motion.

Authors:  I Murakami
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk; Robert F Dougherty; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Confusion of space and time in the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Kairi Kreegipuu; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Motion-sensitive neurones in V5/MT modulate perceived spatial position.

Authors:  Paul V McGraw; Vincent Walsh; Brendan T Barrett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: the role of transient signals in perceiving position.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Romi Nijhawan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: signal suppression or neural noise generation?

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Colin W G Clifford; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

Authors:  David Whitney; Amanda Ellison; Nichola J Rice; Derek Arnold; Melvyn Goodale; Vincent Walsh; David Milner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays.

Authors:  Romi Nijhawan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.579

View more
  14 in total

1.  Organization of area hV5/MT+ in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Amalia Papanikolaou; Georgios A Keliris; T Dorina Papageorgiou; Ulrich Schiefer; Nikos K Logothetis; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Causal evidence for a privileged working memory state in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain; Eva Feredoes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.

Authors:  Lina Teichmann; Grace Edwards; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Anticipatory alpha phase influences visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; James Z Chadick; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Motion-dependent representation of space in area MT+.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Action can amplify motion-induced illusory displacement.

Authors:  Franck Caniard; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  An Orientation Dependent Size Illusion Is Underpinned by Processing in the Extrastriate Visual Area, LO1.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; André D Gouws; Hannah Clawson; Peter Thompson; Antony B Morland; Bruce D Keefe
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-09-26

8.  The Flash-Lag Effect as a Motion-Based Predictive Shift.

Authors:  Mina A Khoei; Guillaume S Masson; Laurent U Perrinet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Do the flash-lag effect and representational momentum involve similar extrapolations?

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-23

10.  Perceptual shrinkage of a one-way motion path with high-speed motion.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakajima; Yutaka Sakaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.