Literature DB >> 10972130

Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system.

A Hayes1.   

Abstract

An assumption inherent in many models of visual space is that the spatial coordinates of retinal cells implicitly give rise to the perceptual code for position. The results of the experiments reported here, in which it is shown that retinally non-veridical locations of contour elements are used by the visual system for contour-element binding, lend support to a different view. The visual system does not implicitly code position with reference to the labelled locations of retinal cells, but dynamically extracts spatial position from the aggregate result of local computations. These computations may include local spatial relationships between retinal cells, but are not confined to them; other computations, including position derived from local velocity cues, are combined to code the position of objects in the visual world.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10972130      PMCID: PMC1690680          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

1.  Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects.

Authors:  D M MACKAY
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1958-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Dynamic stabilization of receptive fields of cortical neurons (VI) during fixation of gaze in the macaque.

Authors:  B C Motter; G F Poggio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors.

Authors:  R L De Valois; K K De Valois
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Long-range interactions in visual perception.

Authors:  L Spillmann; J S Werner
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 5.  Visual brain and visual perception: how does the cortex do perceptual grouping?

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla; W D Ross
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Compression of visual space before saccades.

Authors:  J Ross; M C Morrone; D C Burr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Seeing objects in motion.

Authors:  D C Burr; J Ross; M C Morrone
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1986-03-22

8.  Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local "association field".

Authors:  D J Field; A Hayes; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage.

Authors:  J Zihl; D von Cramon; N Mai
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  7 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  A bias-free measure of retinotopic tilt adaptation.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Sensitivity and configuration-specificity of orientation-defined texture processing in infants and adults.

Authors:  Francesca Pei; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The role of motion and number of element locations in mirror symmetry perception.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sharman; Elena Gheorghiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods.

Authors:  M J Morgan; D Melmoth; J A Solomon
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.