Literature DB >> 12815432

The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

David Whitney1, David A Westwood, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

One of the most important functions of vision is to direct actions to objects. However, every time that vision is used to guide an action, retinal motion signals are produced by the movement of the eye and head as the person looks at the object or by the motion of other objects in the scene. To reach for the object accurately, the visuomotor system must separate information about the position of the stationary target from background retinal motion signals-a long-standing problem that is poorly understood. Here we show that the visuomotor system does not distinguish between these two information sources: when observers made fast reaching movements to a briefly presented stationary target, their hand shifted in a direction consistent with the motion of a distant and unrelated stimulus, a result contrary to most other findings. This can be seen early in the hand's trajectory (approximately 120 ms) and occurs continuously from programming of the movement through to its execution. The visuomotor system might make use of the motion signals arising from eye and head movements to update the positions of targets rapidly and redirect the hand to compensate for body movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12815432      PMCID: PMC3890253          DOI: 10.1038/nature01693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  28 in total

1.  Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Murray R Jarvis; Aaron P Batista; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern.

Authors:  S Nishida; A Johnston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.

Authors:  M A Goodale; D Pelisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus.

Authors:  D Pélisson; C Prablanc; M A Goodale; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans.

Authors:  G Masson; L Proteau; D R Mestre
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Saccadic programming and perceived location.

Authors:  E Wong; A Mack
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08
View more
  31 in total

1.  On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Aftab E Patla; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ayla Tessmer; Gordon Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

Authors:  David Whitney; Amanda Ellison; Nichola J Rice; Derek Arnold; Melvyn Goodale; Vincent Walsh; David Milner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The hand's automatic pilot can update visual information while the eye is in motion.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; James T Enns; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Local motion inside an object affects pointing less than smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Angélique Gauch; Blandine Ulmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target.

Authors:  Philipp Kreyenmeier; Jolande Fooken; Miriam Spering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.