Literature DB >> 17190608

Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Susana T L Chung1, Saumil S Patel, Harold E Bedell, Ozgur Yilmaz.   

Abstract

The perceived position of a stationary Gaussian window of a Gabor target shifts in the direction of motion of the Gabor's carrier stimulus, implying the presence of interactions between the specialized visual areas that encode form, position, and motion. The purpose of this study was to examine the temporal and spatial properties of this illusory motion-induced position shift (MIPS). We measured the magnitude of the MIPS for a pair of horizontally separated (2 or 8deg) truncated-Gabor stimuli (carrier=1 or 4cpd sinusoidal grating, Gaussian envelope SD=18arc min, 50% contrast) or a pair of Gaussian-windowed random-texture patterns that drifted vertically in opposite directions. The magnitude of the MIPS was measured for drift speeds up to 16deg/s and for stimulus durations up to 453ms. The temporal properties of the MIPS depended on the drift speed. At low velocities, the magnitude of the MIPS increased monotonically with the stimulus duration. At higher velocities, the magnitude of the MIPS increased with duration initially, then decreased between approximately 45 and 75ms before rising to reach a steady-state value at longer durations. In general, the magnitude of the MIPS was larger when the truncated-Gabor or random-texture stimuli were more spatially separated, but was similar for the different types of carrier stimuli. Our results are consistent with a framework that suggests that perceived form is modulated dynamically during stimulus motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17190608      PMCID: PMC2734886          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  52 in total

1.  Elevation of Vernier thresholds during image motion depends on target configuration.

Authors:  H E Bedell; S T Chung; S S Patel
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.

Authors:  S S Patel; H Ogmen; H E Bedell; V Sampath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Visual motion analysis for pursuit eye movements in area MT of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  S G Lisberger; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulation sensitivity of ganglion cells in peripheral retina of macaque.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Paul R Martin; Andrew J R White; Lukas Rüttiger; Barry B Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The what and where in visual masking.

Authors:  Haluk Ogmen; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Reginald Melvin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Contrast gain control in first- and second-order motion perception.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Position sense of the peripheral retina.

Authors:  S A Klein; D M Levi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets.

Authors:  S Chen; H E Bedell; H Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

1.  Local motion inside an object affects pointing less than smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Angélique Gauch; Blandine Ulmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Interactions of flicker and motion.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Sion Gutentag; Christopher D Blair; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual motion shifts saccade targets.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual motion induces a forward prediction of spatial pattern.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Perceived positions determine crowding.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Postdictive modulation of visual orientation.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Misperceptions in the trajectories of objects undergoing curvilinear motion.

Authors:  Ozgur Yilmaz; Srimant P Tripathy; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motion streaks do not influence the perceived position of stationary flashed objects.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

10.  Action can amplify motion-induced illusory displacement.

Authors:  Franck Caniard; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.