Literature DB >> 11983584

The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

David Whitney1.   

Abstract

The ability of the visual system to localize objects is one of its most important functions and yet remains one of the least understood, especially when either the object or the surrounding scene is in motion. The specific process that assigns positions under these circumstances is unknown, but two major classes of mechanism have emerged: spatial mechanisms that directly influence the coded locations of objects, and temporal mechanisms that influence the speed of perception. Disentangling these mechanisms is one of the first steps towards understanding how the visual system assigns locations to objects when there are motion signals present in the scene.

Year:  2002        PMID: 11983584      PMCID: PMC3849397          DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01887-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  56 in total

1.  Vestibular signals can distort the perceived spatial relationship of retinal stimuli.

Authors:  R H Cai; K Jacobson; R Baloh; M Schlag-Rey; J Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.

Authors:  B Krekelberg; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.

Authors:  S S Patel; H Ogmen; H E Bedell; V Sampath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A flash-lag effect in random motion.

Authors:  I Murakami
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The position of moving objects.

Authors:  D Whitney; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure.

Authors:  I Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Pulfrich effect and the filling in of apparent motion.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 10.  Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview.

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  53 in total

1.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Velocity of motion across the skin influences perception of tactile location.

Authors:  Elizabeth H L Nguyen; Janet L Taylor; Jack Brooks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual acceleration and spatial distortion in right brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  Luca Latini Corazzini; Giuliano Geminiani; Natale Stucchi; Patrizia Gindri; Luigi Cremasco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatially asymmetric response to moving patterns in the visual cortex: re-examining the local sign hypothesis.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Attention governs action in the primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  Robert J Schafer; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.