Literature DB >> 1945738

Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

S Yantis1, E Jones.   

Abstract

When a single abrupt onset appears in a multielement display, it captures attention. When multiple onset elements occur, they have conditional priority over no-onset elements such that a limited number of onsets can be serviced with high priority in visual search (Yantis & Johnson, 1990). We report three experiments in which we assess two possible mechanisms for attentional prioritization: a priority queue into which a fixed number of high-priority elements are placed for early servicing during search, and a mechanism that temporarily tags all high-priority elements for early servicing or more frequent sampling. We manipulated the visual quality or inter-letter confusability of the stimuli to prolong encoding and/or comparison operations; this manipulation led to a decrease in the estimated number of elements serviced with high priority. We conclude that a mechanism incorporating temporally decaying priority tags is implicated in servicing multiple abrupt onsets in visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1945738     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  18 in total

1.  Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.

Authors:  C B Warner; J F Juola; H Koshino
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-09

2.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: a failure to replicate.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; C W Pokorny
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Mechanisms of attentional priority.

Authors:  S Yantis; D N Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Capturing attention.

Authors:  J Jonides; D E Irwin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1981 Aug-Dec

9.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985
View more
  24 in total

1.  Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Linda K Langley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

3.  Interaction of color and geometric cues in depth perception: when does "red" mean "near"?

Authors:  Christophe R C Guibal; Birgitta Dresp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-02-10

4.  The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Herbert Hagendorf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-07

5.  Prioritization by transients in visual search.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

6.  Distractor effects during processing of words under load.

Authors:  Muriele Brand-D'Abrescia; Nili Lavie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

7.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

8.  Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.

Authors:  Chunhong He; Antao Chen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-08-04

9.  Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: no special role for onsets.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

10.  In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Ester Reijnen; Michael J Van Wert; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.