Literature DB >> 15948285

Prioritization by transients in visual search.

Artem V Belopolsky1, Jan Theeuwes, Arthur F Kramer.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate as to whether prioritizing new objects over old objects (the so-called preview benefit) is the result of top-down inhibition of old objects (i.e., visual marking; Watson & Humphreys, 1997) or attentional allocation to new objects, presented with a luminance transient (Donk & Theeuwes, 2001). In the two experiments reported here, we tested whether prioritization by luminance transients alone can produce a subset-selective search similar to the preview effect. Subjects viewed multiobject displays while a subset of objects was briefly flashed. The subjects prioritized up to 14 flashed objects over at least 14 nonflashed objects. Since prioritization by luminance transients can produce a subset-selective search on its own, it may well play an important role in the preview benefit.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15948285     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Visual marking: evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

2.  Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  M Donk; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

3.  Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex--an event-related fMRI study of visual marking.

Authors:  S Pollmann; R Weidner; G W Humphreys; C N L Olivers; K Müller; G Lohmann; C J Wiggins; D G Watson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Marvin M Chun; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Prioritizing selection of new elements: bottom-up versus top-down control.

Authors:  Mieke Donk; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11

6.  Contingent visual marking by transients.

Authors:  Matthew S Peterson; Artem V Belopolsky; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

7.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

Authors:  S Yantis; E Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

8.  Searching through subsets: a test of the visual indexing hypothesis.

Authors:  J A Burkell; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inhibition of return lasts longer at repeatedly stimulated locations than at novel locations.

Authors:  Hsuan-Fu Chao; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

2.  The interplay of goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences on spatial orienting.

Authors:  Mara Otten; Daniel Schreij; Sander A Los
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.