Literature DB >> 16151719

The control of visual attention and its influence on prioritized processing in a location negative priming paradigm.

Rico Fischer1, Herbert Hagendorf.   

Abstract

In a location-based negative priming paradigm, the possibility of a disengagement option of the underlying inhibitory mechanism was tested. Whereas in previous studies disengagement was observed when providing utility information about the probe trial structure, in the present study the allocation of visual attention to the stimuli was manipulated. In the first step an automatic deployment of visual attention was implemented by presenting all stimuli as abrupt onsets (Experiment 1), which demonstrated commonly observed negative priming effects. In further conditions of non-automatic allocation of visual attention in which target and distractor were presented as no-onset stimuli, negative priming effects were eliminated (Experiments 2 and 3). The preferred interpretation is that in conditions of automatic control of attention, target and distractor compete for control of action. A non-automatic control of visual attention, on the other hand, leads to a top-down modulated selection, which results in prioritized target encoding and a loss of distractor impact on the selection process. Alternative accounts and the role of no-onset distractor processing were investigated in Experiment 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151719     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0220-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  46 in total

1.  Negative priming for spatial location?

Authors:  J Christie; R M Klein
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-03

2.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm.

Authors:  A Richards
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1999-05

4.  Deeper processing at target selection increases the magnitude of negative priming.

Authors:  P L Yee; K E Santoro; A L Grey; V Woog
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

5.  Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.

Authors:  M H Sohn; R A Carlson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

7.  Influence of probe-trial selection on the location negative priming effect.

Authors:  Eric Buckolz; Angelo Boulougouris; Michael Khan
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-12

8.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Negative priming without probe selection.

Authors:  W T Neill; K M Terry; L A Valdes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

10.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Authors:  B Milliken; S Joordens; P M Merikle; A E Seiffert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?

Authors:  Caroline Gottschalk; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-05

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Stefanie Kehrer; Antje Kraft; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stefan P Koch; Herbert Hagendorf; Norbert Kathmann; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-03

3.  Neuroimaging evidence for processes underlying repetition of ignored stimuli.

Authors:  Eva Bauer; Helge Gebhardt; Christoph Ruprecht; Bernd Gallhofer; Gebhard Sammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.