Literature DB >> 7644319

Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: no special role for onsets.

D G Watson1, G W Humphreys.   

Abstract

In five experiments, we investigated the power of targets defined by the onset or offset of one of an object's parts (contour onsets and offsets) either to guide or to capture visual attention. In Experiment 1, search for a single contour onset target was compared with search for a single contour offset target against a static background of distractors; no difference was found between the efficiency with which each could be detected. In Experiment 2, onsets and offsets were compared for automatic attention capture, when both occurred simultaneously. Unlike in previous studies, the effects of overall luminance change, new-object creation, and number of onset and offset items were controlled. It was found that contour onset and offset items captured attention equally well. However, display size effects on both target types were also apparent. Such effects may have been due to competition for selection between multiple onset and offset stimuli. In Experiments 3 and 4, single onset and offset stimuli were presented simultaneously and pitted directly against one another among a background of static distractors. In Experiment 3, we examined "guided search," for a target that was formed either from an onset or from an offset among static items. In Experiment 4, the onsets and offsets were uncorrelated with the target location. Similar results occurred in both experiments: target onsets and offsets were detected more efficiently than static stimuli which needed serial search; there remained effects of display size on performance; but there was still no advantage for onsets. In Experiment 5, we examined automatic attention capture by single onset and offset stimuli presented individually among static distractors. Again, there was no advantage for onset over offset targets and a display size effect was also present. These results suggest that, both in isolation and in competition, onsets that do not form new objects neither guide nor gain automatic attention more efficiently than offsets. In addition, in contrast to previous studies in which onsets formed new objects, contour onsets and offsets did not reliably capture attention automatically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644319     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

2.  Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: new tests for stochastic models of cognition and action.

Authors:  S Yantis; D E Meyer; J E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

Authors:  S Yantis; E Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

4.  Mechanisms of attentional priority.

Authors:  S Yantis; D N Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

7.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual motion and attentional capture.

Authors:  A P Hillstrom; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-04

9.  Attentional misguidance in visual search.

Authors:  S Todd; A F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

10.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: evidence from motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Werner Klotz; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

4.  Onset of illusory figures attenuates change blindness.

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Gustav Kuhn; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

5.  Opposite neural signatures of motion-induced blindness in human dorsal and ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Tobias H Donner; Dov Sagi; Yoram S Bonneh; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Attention capture by abrupt onsets: re-visiting the priority tag model.

Authors:  Meera M Sunny; Adrian von Mühlenen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-20

7.  Attentive and pre-attentive processes in change detection and identification.

Authors:  Howard C Hughes; Gideon Paul Caplovitz; Rebecca A Loucks; Robert Fendrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.