Literature DB >> 2243759

Inhibitory tagging in visual search: a failure to replicate.

J M Wolfe1, C W Pokorny.   

Abstract

Klein (1988) reported that increased reaction times for the detection of small light probes could be used as an indicator of inhibitory tagging of rejected distractors in serial visual search tasks. Such a paradigm would be very useful in the study of the mechanics of visual search. Unfortunately, we cannot replicate the result. In this study, we found that probe reaction times were elevated at all distractor locations, relative to empty locations, following both parallel and serial search tasks. This appears to be a forward masking effect.

Mesh：

Year:  1990        PMID： 2243759     DOI： 10.3758/bf03206686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


  5 in total

1.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.

Authors:  A Treisman; J Souther
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-09

3.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-08-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets.

Authors:  H E Egeth; R A Virzi; H Garbart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468
  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.

Authors:  H W Kwak; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

2.  Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Michael S Ambinder; Brendon Hsieh; Brian Levinthal; James A Crowell; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Alejandro Lleras; Daniel J Simons; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

3.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

Authors:  S Yantis; E Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

4.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

5.  Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages.

Authors:  T J Simon; S Vaishnavi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

6.  Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion.

Authors:  W C Schmidt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

Review 7.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations.

Authors:  B S Gibson; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

9.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

10.  Environment- and eye-centered inhibitory cueing effects are both observed after a methodological confound is eliminated.

Authors:  Tao He; Yun Ding; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.