Literature DB >> 18229489

Distractor effects during processing of words under load.

Muriele Brand-D'Abrescia1, Nili Lavie.   

Abstract

The perceptual load model of attention (Lavie, 1995) suggests that processing of irrelevant distractors depends on the extent to which a relevant task engages full perceptual capacity. Word recognition models suggest that letter perception is facilitated in words relative to nonwords. These models led us to hypothesize that increasing the number of letters would increase perceptual load more for nonwords than for words, and thus would be more likely to exhaust capacity and eliminate distractor processing for nonwords than for words. In support of this hypothesis, we found that increasing the number of search letters increases RTs more for nonwords than for words and only reduces distractor interference for nonwords. Thus, although readers process words more efficiently than nonwords, they also become more prone to distraction when processing words.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18229489     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

Review 1.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors:  M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The role of perceptual load in negative priming.

Authors:  N Lavie; E Fox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

4.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

Review 5.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: temporally modulated priority tags.

Authors:  S Yantis; E Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

7.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Multiple parallel access in visual attention.

Authors:  Z Pylyshyn; J Burkell; B Fisher; C Sears; W Schmidt; L Trick
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1994-06

9.  Limited-channel models of automatic detection: capacity and scanning in visual search.

Authors:  D L Fisher
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.

Authors:  C L Allegretti; J T Puglisi
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1982-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Race and gender of faces can be ignored.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Liana Machado; Benjamin Knight
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-10-15

2.  Interference from familiar natural distractors is not eliminated by high perceptual load.

Authors:  Chunhong He; Antao Chen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-08-04

3.  Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Ana Torralbo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Is "hit and run" a single word? The processing of irreversible binomials in neglect dyslexia.

Authors:  Giorgio Arcara; Graziano Lacaita; Elisa Mattaloni; Laura Passarini; Sara Mondini; Paola Benincà; Carlo Semenza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-03

5.  How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell; François Vachon; Paul J Taylor; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load.

Authors:  Sophie Forster; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-26

7.  Load induced blindness.

Authors:  James S P Macdonald; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Degraded stimulus visibility and the effects of perceptual load on distractor interference.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Hadas Marciano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-29

9.  Spatial attention in written word perception.

Authors:  Veronica Montani; Andrea Facoetti; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.