Literature DB >> 19396475

Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs.

Stefania Vaga1, M Brayda-Bruno, F Perona, M Fornari, M T Raimondi, M Petruzzi, G Grava, F Costa, E G Caiani, C Lamartina.   

Abstract

The dynamic stabilization of lumbar spine is a non-fusion stabilization system that unloads the disc without the complete loss of motion at the treated motion segment. Clinical outcomes are promising but still not definitive, and the long-term effect on instrumented and adjacent levels is still a matter of discussion. Several experiments have been devised in order to gain a better understanding of the effect of the device on the intervertebral disc. One of the hypotheses was that while instrumented levels are partially relieved from loading, adjacent levels suffer from the increased stress. But this has not been proved yet. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of dynamic stabilization in vivo, through the quantification of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) concentration within instrumented and adjacent levels by means of the delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) protocol. Ten patients with low back pain, unresponsive to conservative treatment and scheduled for Dynesys implantation at one to three lumbar spine levels, underwent the dGEMRIC protocol to quantify GAG concentration before and 6 months after surgery. Each patient was also evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry, Prolo, Modic and Pfirrmann scales, both at pre-surgery and at follow-up. Six months after implantation, VAS, Prolo and Oswestry scales had improved in all patients. Pfirrmann scale could not detect any change, while dGEMRIC data already showed a general improvement in the instrumented levels: GAG was increased in 61% of the instrumented levels, while 68% of the non-instrumented levels showed a decrease in GAG, mainly in the posterior disc portion. In particular, seriously GAG-depleted discs seemed to have the greatest benefit from the Dynesys implantation, whereas less degenerated discs underwent a GAG depletion. dGEMRIC was able to visualize changes in both instrumented and non-instrumented levels. Our results suggest that the dynamic stabilization of lumbar spine is able to stop and partially reverse the disc degeneration, especially in seriously degenerated discs, while incrementing the stress on the adjacent levels, where it induces a matrix suffering and an early degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396475      PMCID: PMC2899614          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0996-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro.

Authors:  S Freudiger; G Dubois; M Lorrain
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Lumbar disc degeneration: epidemiology and genetic influences.

Authors:  Michele C Battié; Tapio Videman; Eric Parent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: DYNESYS.

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach; Ulrich Berlemann; Thomas M Stoll; Gilles Dubois
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Diurnal fluid changes of lumbar discs measured indirectly by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H Paajanen; I Lehto; A Alanen; M Erkintalo; M Komu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Sascha V Schneider; Julia F Funk; Stephan W Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Arnoldo Benini; Astrid Junge; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders.

Authors:  Russ P Nockels
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Pain measurement: an overview.

Authors:  C R Chapman; K L Casey; R Dubner; K M Foley; R H Gracely; A E Reading
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  17 in total

1.  [Dynamic posterior stabilization with the pedicle screw system DYNESYS®].

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach; Ulrich Berlemann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Lin Liu; Zheng-Cheng Zhong; Hung-Wei Hsu; Shih-Liang Shih; Shih-Tien Wang; Chinghua Hung; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Dosik Hwang; Sewon Kim; Nirusha A Abeydeera; Sheronda Statum; Koichi Masuda; Christine B Chung; Palanan Siriwanarangsun; Won C Bae
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

5.  Biomechanical analysis and design of a dynamic spinal fixator using topology optimization: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Ming Lin; Chien-Lin Liu; Yung-Ning Pan; Chang-Hung Huang; Shih-Liang Shih; Shun-Hwa Wei; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Shun-Wu Fan; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Feng-Dong Zhao; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  MRI-biochemical follow up measurements of lumbar intervertebral disc in patients with leg length discrepancy: Is it possible to alter cartilage damage with conservative therapy?

Authors:  Miriam Frenken; David Latz; Erik Schiffner; Wolfgang Alois Quante; Maxime Knautz; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Benedikt Schaarschmidt; Christoph Schleich
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-06-04

8.  Minimum ten-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Arne Mehrkens; Stefan Schären; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

9.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15

10.  Role of dynesys as pedicle-based nonfusion stabilization for degenerative disc disorders.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.