Literature DB >> 15738772

The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone.

Michael Putzier1, Sascha V Schneider, Julia F Funk, Stephan W Tohtz, Carsten Perka.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Clinical and radiologic study evaluating the outcome after nucleotomy with dynamic stabilization compared with nucleotomy alone.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of dynamic stabilization on the progression of segmental degeneration after nucleotomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nucleotomy as treatment for lumbar disc prolapse in combination with initial segment degeneration may lead to segmental instability. Dynamic stabilization systems restrict segmental motion and thus prevent further degeneration of the lumbar spine. They are designed to avoid the disadvantages of rigid fixation, such as pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment degeneration.
METHODS: Eighty-four patients underwent nucleotomy of the lumbar spine for the treatment of symptomatic disc prolapse. Additional dynamic stabilization (DYNESYS) was performed in 35 of those cases. All patients showed signs of initial disc degeneration (MODIC I). They underwent evaluation before surgery, 3 months after surgery, and at follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 34 months. Examinations included radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), physical examination, and subjective patient evaluation using Oswestry score and visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Clinical symptoms, Oswestry score, and VAS improved significantly in both groups after 3 months. At follow-up, a significant increase in the Oswestry score and in the VAS was seen only in the nonstabilized group. In the dynamically stabilized group, no progression of disc degeneration was noted at follow-up, whereas radiologic signs of accelerated segmental degeneration existed in the solely nucleotomized group. There were no implant-associated complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The applied dynamic stabilization system is useful to prevent progression of initial degenerative disc disease of lumbar spinal segments after nucleotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738772     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000154630.79887.ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  47 in total

1.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez; Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos; Isabel Ramírez-Mora; Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivarez; Armando Alpizar-Aguirre; Guadalupe Sánchez-Bringas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Short-term effects of a dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) for multi-segmental lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Jun Liu; Ying Shi; Yu Chen; Hailong Yu; Junxiong Ma; Weijian Ren; Huifeng Yang; Hongwei Wang; Liangbi Xiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration.

Authors:  Matthias Bothmann; Erich Kast; Gerald Jens Boldt; Joachim Oberle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Characterization of the annulus fibrosus-vertebral body interface: identification of new structural features.

Authors:  Y S Nosikova; J P Santerre; M Grynpas; G Gibson; R A Kandel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Outcome of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis due to discogenic under percutaneous laser disc decompression.

Authors:  Ahmad Shekarchizadeh; Ali Mohammadi-Moghadam; Majid Rezvani; Peyman Rahmani; Nourallah Eshraghi; Keyvan Ghadimi
Journal:  Am J Neurodegener Dis       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 9.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Yue-Hui Zhang; Chang-Qing Zhao; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Xiao-Dong Chen; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.