Literature DB >> 21153012

[Dynamic posterior stabilization with the pedicle screw system DYNESYS®].

Othmar Schwarzenbach1, Ulrich Berlemann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The dynamic neutralization system for the spine (DYNESYS®) is a pedicle screw based system intending mobile restabilization substituting physiological tissue restraints and thus approximating the unstable motion pattern to a normal pattern. It consists of titanium alloy screws, connected by an elastic synthetic compound (PET band and PCU spacer) controlling motion in any plane. DYNESYS® can be used for mono- or multilevel stabilizations in the lumbar spine. INDICATIONS: DYNESYS® is indicated in the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar motion segment with instability and most often in combination with functional or structural spinal canal stenosis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Primary and secondary bone tumors of the spine. Spinal fractures. Infections. Lytic/isthmic spondylolisthesis. Degenerative spondylolisthesis > I°-II°. Facetectomy. Stabilization of thoracic and cervical spine. Allergies to components of DYNESYS®. Pregnancy. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Standard midline approach. Decompression of the segment by laminotomy if indicated. Place the screws lateral to the facet joints. Measure the distance between the screw heads. Cut the spacers. Introduce spacer and cord on both sides. The length of the PCU spacer is determined by the distance of the pedicle screws and depends on the pathology of the lumbar motion segment. Tighten set screws under correct compression of the system. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Mobilisation at the first day after surgery. No bracing necessary if there is no doubt about primary fixation of the screws. Physical strenuous work not earlier than 8 weeks postoperatively.
RESULTS: DYNESYS® is a reliable dynamic stabilization system with good clinical results if used in correct indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21153012     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-1007-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  15 in total

1.  [Application of a dynamic pedicle screw system (DYNESYS) for lumbar segmental degenerations - comparison of clinical and radiological results for different indications].

Authors:  M Putzier; S V Schneider; J Funk; C Perka
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

2.  Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christina A Niosi; Qingan A Zhu; Derek C Wilson; Ory Keynan; David R Wilson; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Charles Carazzo; René Schmidt; Thomas Mattes; Heiko Reichel; Wolfram Käfer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; James Beastall; Justin Hughes; Efthimios J Karadimas; Malcolm Nicol; Francis Smith; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.

Authors:  Philippe Gédet; Daniel Haschtmann; Paul A Thistlethwaite; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  How does spinal canal decompression and dorsal stabilization affect segmental mobility? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Karl-Stefan Delank; Erol Gercek; Sebastian Kuhn; Frank Hartmann; H Hely; Marc Röllinghoff; M A Rothschild; H Stützer; Rolf Sobottke; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.

Authors:  Thomas M Stoll; Gilles Dubois; Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; J F Huber; T Nydegger; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Ivan Broger; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Christof Hurschler; Marcel Haversath; Ulf Liljenqvist; Viola Bullmann; Timm J Filler; Nani Osada; Eva-Maria Fallenberg; Lars Hackenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  1 in total

1.  Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Lei Luo; Chen Zhao; Pei Li; Liehua Liu; Qiang Zhou; Fei Luo; Lichuan Liang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.037

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.