PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate early ASD at short-term follow-up in fused and unoperated patients with degenerative disc disease, using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of the area, signal intensity and their product, i.e., MRI index of the central bright area of the disc as well as measures of intervertebral disc height and Pfirrmann grading scale. The further purpose was to determine whether fusion accelerates ASD compared with non-surgical treatment in short-term follow-up. METHODS: One hundred and eight chronic low back patients diagnosed as L4/L5 degeneration undertook either one-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion or conservative treatment. They were followed up for about 1 year. Finally 46 fused and 45 conservatively treated patients with MRI follow-up were included. Pre- and post-treatment MRIs were compared to determine the progression of disc degeneration at the two cranial adjacent segments. RESULTS: The area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area of the adjacent discs decreased in the operated and unoperated groups from pre-treatment to follow-up, except for an insignificant decrease of signal intensity at the second adjacent segment in the unoperated group. The changes in these parameters were statistically greater at the first than the second adjacent segment in the fused group, but not in the unoperated group. And the changes in the fused group were more pronounced than those at both neighbouring levels in the unoperated group. However, the Pfirrmann grading scale and intervertebral disc height did not detect any changes at adjacent discs in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in the parameters of quantitative MRI analysis indicated early degeneration at discs adjacent to lumbar spinal fusion. Fusion had an independent effect on the natural history of ASD during short-term follow-up. Continued longitudinal follow-up is required to determine whether these MRI changes lead to pathologic changes.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate early ASD at short-term follow-up in fused and unoperated patients with degenerative disc disease, using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of the area, signal intensity and their product, i.e., MRI index of the central bright area of the disc as well as measures of intervertebral disc height and Pfirrmann grading scale. The further purpose was to determine whether fusion accelerates ASD compared with non-surgical treatment in short-term follow-up. METHODS: One hundred and eight chronic low backpatients diagnosed as L4/L5 degeneration undertook either one-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion or conservative treatment. They were followed up for about 1 year. Finally 46 fused and 45 conservatively treated patients with MRI follow-up were included. Pre- and post-treatment MRIs were compared to determine the progression of disc degeneration at the two cranial adjacent segments. RESULTS: The area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area of the adjacent discs decreased in the operated and unoperated groups from pre-treatment to follow-up, except for an insignificant decrease of signal intensity at the second adjacent segment in the unoperated group. The changes in these parameters were statistically greater at the first than the second adjacent segment in the fused group, but not in the unoperated group. And the changes in the fused group were more pronounced than those at both neighbouring levels in the unoperated group. However, the Pfirrmann grading scale and intervertebral disc height did not detect any changes at adjacent discs in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in the parameters of quantitative MRI analysis indicated early degeneration at discs adjacent to lumbar spinal fusion. Fusion had an independent effect on the natural history of ASD during short-term follow-up. Continued longitudinal follow-up is required to determine whether these MRI changes lead to pathologic changes.
Authors: Kosaku Higashino; Takahiko Hamasaki; Jin Hwan Kim; Motohiro Okada; S T Yoon; Scott D Boden; William C Hutton Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Stefania Vaga; M Brayda-Bruno; F Perona; M Fornari; M T Raimondi; M Petruzzi; G Grava; F Costa; E G Caiani; C Lamartina Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-04-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Helen E Gruber; Brian Gordon; Cliff Williams; Jane A Ingram; H James Norton; Edward N Hanley Journal: Lab Anim Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Plassard; Aaron Carass; Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Jerry L Prince; Bennett A Landman Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Katrin Stosch-Wiechert; Karin Wuertz-Kozak; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph J Siepe Journal: Brain Spine Date: 2022-08-06