Literature DB >> 21523456

Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Chien-Lin Liu1, Zheng-Cheng Zhong, Hung-Wei Hsu, Shih-Liang Shih, Shih-Tien Wang, Chinghua Hung, Chen-Sheng Chen.   

Abstract

The Dynesys dynamics stabilisation system was developed to maintain the mobility of motion segment of the lumbar spine in order to reduce the incidence of negative effects at the adjacent segments. However, the magnitude of cord pretension may change the stiffness of the Dynesys system and result in a diverse clinical outcome, and the effects of Dynesys cord pretension remain unclear. Displacement-controlled finite element analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of the lumbar spine after insertion of Dynesys with three different cord pretensions. For the implanted level, increasing the cord pretension from 100 to 300 N resulted in an increase in flexion stiffness from 19.0 to 64.5 Nm/deg, a marked increase in facet contact force (FCF) of 35% in extension and 32% in torsion, a 40% increase of the annulus stress in torsion, and an increase in the high-stress region of the pedicle screw in flexion and lateral bending. For the adjacent levels, varying the cord pretension from 100 to 300 N only had a minor influence on range of motion (ROM), FCF, and annulus stress, with changes of 6, 12, and 9%, respectively. This study found that alteration of cord pretension affects the ROM and FCF, and annulus stress within the construct but not the adjacent segment. In addition, use of a 300 N cord pretension causes a much higher stiffness at the implanted level when compared with the intact lumbar spine.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21523456      PMCID: PMC3207341          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1817-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

Review 1.  Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges.

Authors:  H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; J F Huber; T Nydegger; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

3.  Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.

Authors:  Chien-Lin Liu; Zheng-Cheng Zhong; Shih-Liang Shih; Chinghua Hung; Yong-Eng Lee; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-08

4.  Applying a follower load delivers realistic results for simulating standing.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; T Zander; M Rao; G Bergmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Load- and displacement-controlled finite element analyses on fusion and non-fusion spinal implants.

Authors:  Z-C Zhong; S-H Chen; C-H Hung
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 6.  Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland; Dilip K Sengupta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.

Authors:  Thomas M Stoll; Gilles Dubois; Othmar Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Ivan Broger; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Stefania Vaga; M Brayda-Bruno; F Perona; M Fornari; M T Raimondi; M Petruzzi; G Grava; F Costa; E G Caiani; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability.

Authors:  Carola C Würgler-Hauri; Andreas Kalbarczyk; Markus Wiesli; Hans Landolt; Javier Fandino
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis and design of a dynamic spinal fixator using topology optimization: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Ming Lin; Chien-Lin Liu; Yung-Ning Pan; Chang-Hung Huang; Shih-Liang Shih; Shun-Hwa Wei; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Biomechanical Comparison between Isobar and Dynamic-Transitional Optima (DTO) Hybrid Lumbar Fixators: A Lumbosacral Finite Element and Intersegmental Motion Analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Chih-Kun Hsiao; Chih-Wei Wang; Hsiang-Ho Chen; Zheng-Cheng Zhong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after decompressive surgery--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Shang-Chih Lin; Wen-Chi Tsai; Chih-Wei Wang; Shih-Heng Chao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The Change of Sagittal Alignment of the Lumbar Spine after Dynesys Stabilization and Proposal of a Refinement.

Authors:  Won Man Park; Chi Heon Kim; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-07-31

5.  Finite element simulation and clinical follow-up of lumbar spine biomechanics with dynamic fixations.

Authors:  Yolanda Más; Luis Gracia; Elena Ibarz; Sergio Gabarre; Diego Peña; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of different inner core diameters on structural strength of cannulated pedicle screws under various lumbar spine movements.

Authors:  Chia-Ming Chang; Yu-Shu Lai; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  Biomechanical modelling of the facet joints: a review of methods and validation processes in finite element analysis.

Authors:  Marlène Mengoni
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-11-22

8.  Influence of posterior pedicle screw fixation at L4-L5 level on biomechanics of the lumbar spine with and without fusion: a finite element method.

Authors:  Emre Sengul; Ramazan Ozmen; Mesut Emre Yaman; Teyfik Demir
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Optimization of a lumbar interspinous fixation device for the lumbar spine with degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Minhyeok Heo; Jihwan Yun; Hanjong Kim; Sang-Soo Lee; Seonghun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study.

Authors:  Shih-Liang Shih; Chien-Lin Liu; Li-Ying Huang; Chang-Hung Huang; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.