Literature DB >> 19379050

Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.

Adrian Staub1, Margaret Grant, Charles Clifton, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Using a word-by-word self-paced reading paradigm, T. A. Farmer, M. H. Christiansen, and P. Monaghan (2006) reported faster reading times for words that are phonologically typical for their syntactic category (i.e., noun or verb) than for words that are phonologically atypical. This result has been taken to suggest that language users are sensitive to subtle relationships between sound and syntactic function and that they make rapid use of this information in comprehension. The present article reports attempts to replicate this result using both eyetracking during normal reading (Experiment 1) and word-by-word self-paced reading (Experiment 2). No hint of a phonological typicality effect emerged on any reading-time measure in Experiment 1, nor did Experiment 2 replicate Farmer et al.'s finding from self-paced reading. Indeed, the differences between condition means were not consistently in the predicted direction, as phonologically atypical verbs were read more quickly than phonologically typical verbs, on most measures. Implications for research on visual word recognition are discussed. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19379050      PMCID: PMC2844803          DOI: 10.1037/a0015123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  18 in total

1.  The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Perea; K S Binder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Lau; Clare Stroud; Silke Plesch; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

7.  Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.

Authors:  Sarah J White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

9.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

10.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of noun and verb differences in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Christine Boylan; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The Specificity of Sound Symbolic Correspondences in Spoken Language.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Lynne C Nygaard; Laura L Namy
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

3.  (Early) context effects on event-related potentials over natural inputs.

Authors:  Shaorong Yan; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Margaret Grant; Charles Clifton; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.

Authors:  Alex B Fine; T Florian Jaeger; Thomas A Farmer; Ting Qian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hyper-active gap filling.

Authors:  Akira Omaki; Ellen F Lau; Imogen Davidson White; Myles L Dakan; Aaron Apple; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.