Literature DB >> 21895397

Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen.

Adrian Staub1, Margaret Grant, Charles Clifton, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

In this brief rejoinder, we respond to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen (2011). We argue that the data still do not support the claim that reading time is affected by the phonological typicality of a word for its part of speech. We also question Farmer et al.'s claim that interleaving syntactic structures in an experiment modifies grammatically based syntactic expectations. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895397      PMCID: PMC3618979          DOI: 10.1037/a0024193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  5 in total

1.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Morten H Christiansen; Padraic Monaghan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Padraic Monaghan; Jennifer B Misyak; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Margaret Grant; Charles Clifton; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.051

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.