Literature DB >> 18248149

Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.

Sarah J White1.   

Abstract

Word frequency and orthographic familiarity were independently manipulated as readers' eye movements were recorded. Word frequency influenced fixation durations and the probability of word skipping when orthographic familiarity was controlled. These results indicate that lexical processing of words can influence saccade programming (as shown by fixation durations and which words are fixated). Orthographic familiarity, but not word frequency, influenced the duration of prior fixations. These results provide evidence for orthographic, but not lexical, parafoveal-on-foveal effects. Overall, the findings have a crucial implication for models of eye movement control in reading: There must be sufficient time for lexical factors to influence saccade programming before saccade metrics and timing are finalized. The conclusions are critical for the fundamental architecture of models of eye movement control in reading -- namely, how to reconcile long saccade programming times and complex linguistic influences on saccades during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18248149     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Investigating the Processing of Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from Eye-Movement Data.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Sung; Jih-Ho Cha; Jung-Yueh Tu; Ming-Da Wu; Wei-Chun Lin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

2.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

5.  Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

7.  Reading during the composition of multi-sentence texts: an eye-movement study.

Authors:  Mark Torrance; Roger Johansson; Victoria Johansson; Åsa Wengelin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-29

8.  Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Ashley Benatar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

10.  The emergence of frequency effects in eye movements.

Authors:  Polina M Vanyukov; Tessa Warren; Mark E Wheeler; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.