Literature DB >> 32617349

(Early) context effects on event-related potentials over natural inputs.

Shaorong Yan1, T Florian Jaeger2.   

Abstract

Language understanding requires the integration of the input with preceding context. Event-related potentials (ERPs) have contributed significantly to our understanding of what contextual information is accessed and when. Much of this research has, however, been limited to experimenter-designed stimuli with highly atypical lexical and context statistics. This raises questions about the extent to which previous findings generalize to everyday language processing of natural stimuli with typical linguistic statistics. We ask whether context can affect ERPs over natural stimuli early, before the N400 time window. We re-analyzed a data set of ERPs over ~700 visually presented content words in sentences from English novels. To increase power, we employed linear mixed effects regression simultaneously modeling random variance by subject and by item. To reduce concerns about Type I error inflation common to any type of time series analysis, we introduced a simple approach to model and discount auto-correlations at multiple, empirically determined, time lags. We compared this approach to Bonferroni correction. Planned follow-up analyses used Generalized Additive Mixture Models to assess the linearity of contextual effects, including lexical surprisal, found within the N400 time window. We found that contextual information affects ERPs in both early (~200ms after word onset) and late (N400) time windows, supporting a cascading, interactive account of lexical access.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auto-correlation; event-related potentials; generalized additive mixture models; mixed-effects regression; time course analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 32617349      PMCID: PMC7331969          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1597979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  57 in total

1.  This construction needs learned.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Arthur M Glenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

2.  Rapid interactions between lexical semantic and word form analysis during word recognition in context: evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Albert Kim; Vicky Lai
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Both sides get the point: hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Heinke Mai; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

4.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  C Van Petten; M Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-07

5.  The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-04

6.  Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Modeling nonlinear relationships in ERP data using mixed-effects regression with R examples.

Authors:  Antoine Tremblay; Aaron J Newman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Limits on lexical prediction during reading.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).

Authors:  Marta Kutas; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.