Literature DB >> 16620944

The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis.

Ellen Lau1, Clare Stroud, Silke Plesch, Colin Phillips.   

Abstract

A number of recent electrophysiological studies of sentence processing have shown that a subclass of syntactic violations elicits very rapid ERP responses, occurring within around 200 ms of the onset of the violation. Such findings raise the question of how it is possible to diagnose violations so quickly. This paper suggests that very rapid diagnosis of errors is possible specifically in situations where the diagnosis problem is tightly constrained by specific expectations generated before the critical word is presented. In an event-related potentials (ERP) study of visual sentence reading participants encountered violations of a word order constraint (...Max's of...) that has elicited early ERP responses in previous studies. Across conditions the illicit sequence was held constant, while sentence context was used to manipulate the expectation for a noun following the possessor Max's, by manipulating the possibility of ellipsis of the head noun. Results showed that the anterior negativity elicited by the word category violation was attenuated when the availability of ellipsis reduced the expectation for a noun in the position of the offending preposition of, with divergence between conditions starting around 200 ms after the onset of the violation. This suggests a role for structural expectations in accounting for very fast syntactic diagnosis processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16620944     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  47 in total

1.  Processing gapped verbs.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Carlie Overfelt; Do Tromp; Frank Wijnen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-08

2.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

3.  An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences.

Authors:  Yoshiko Yamada; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Spatiotemporal Signatures of Lexical-Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Kirsten Weber; Alexandre Gramfort; Matti S Hämäläinen; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns.

Authors:  Cynthia Lukyanenko; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-09

6.  Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The processing of extraposed structures in English.

Authors:  Roger Levy; Evelina Fedorenko; Mara Breen; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-10-27

8.  Expectation and Locality Effects in German Verb-final Structures.

Authors:  Roger P Levy; Frank Keller
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Similar Neural Correlates for Language and Sequential Learning: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Morten H Christiansen; Christopher M Conway; Luca Onnis
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.