Literature DB >> 19376960

Adaptive echolocation behavior in bats for the analysis of auditory scenes.

Chen Chiu1, Wei Xian, Cynthia F Moss.   

Abstract

Echolocating bats emit sonar pulses and listen to returning echoes to probe their surroundings. Bats adapt their echolocation call design to cope with dynamic changes in the acoustic environment, including habitat change or the presence of nearby conspecifics/heterospecifics. Seven pairs of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, were tested in this study to examine how they adjusted their echolocation calls when flying and competing with a conspecific for food. Results showed that differences in five call parameters, start/end frequencies, duration, bandwidth and sweep rate, significantly increased in the two-bat condition compared with the baseline data. In addition, the magnitude of spectral separation of calls was negatively correlated with the baseline call design differences in individual bats. Bats with small baseline call frequency differences showed larger increases in call frequency separation when paired than those with large baseline call frequency differences, suggesting that bats actively change their sonar call structure if pre-existing differences in call design are small. Call design adjustments were also influenced by physical spacing between two bats. Calls of paired bats exhibited the largest design separations when inter-bat distance was shorter than 0.5 m, and the separation decreased as the spacing increased. All individuals modified at least one baseline call parameter in response to the presence of another conspecific. We propose that dissimilarity between the time-frequency features of sonar calls produced by different bats aids each individual in segregating echoes of its own sonar vocalizations from the acoustic signals of neighboring bats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376960      PMCID: PMC2726850          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.027045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  24 in total

1.  Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds.

Authors:  R W Ficken; M S Ficken; J P Hailman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Auditory grouping.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  C F Moss; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tracking silence: adjusting vocal production to avoid acoustic interference.

Authors:  S E Roian Egnor; Jeanette Graham Wickelgren; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The degradation of distance discrimination in big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) caused by different interference signals.

Authors:  W M Masters; K A Raver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral contrasts underlying auditory stream segregation in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09

8.  Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  S H Hulse; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; A B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Arctiid moth clicks can degrade the accuracy of range difference discrimination in echolocating big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  L A Miller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Antimasking aspects of harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) underwater vocalizations.

Authors:  Arturo Serrano; John M Terhune
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  27 in total

1.  Convergence of reference frequencies by multiple CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) during paired flights evaluated with onboard microphones.

Authors:  Yuto Furusawa; Shizuko Hiryu; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Temporal encoding precision of bat auditory neurons tuned to target distance deteriorates on the way to the cortex.

Authors:  Silvio Macías; Julio C Hechavarría; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Regulation of bat echolocation pulse acoustics by striatal dopamine.

Authors:  Jedediah Tressler; Christine Schwartz; Paul Wellman; Samuel Hughes; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Mapping vocalization-related immediate early gene expression in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Christine P Schwartz; Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Adaptive vocal behavior drives perception by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Chen Chiu; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Neural processing of target distance by echolocating bats: functional roles of the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Wenstrup; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Non-kin cooperation in bats.

Authors:  Gerald S Wilkinson; Gerald G Carter; Kirsten M Bohn; Danielle M Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.