Literature DB >> 28973851

Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Jinhong Luo1, Cynthia F Moss2.   

Abstract

Many species of bat emit acoustic signals and use information carried by echoes reflecting from nearby objects to navigate and forage. It is widely documented that echolocating bats adjust the features of sonar calls in response to echo feedback; however, it remains unknown whether audiovocal feedback contributes to sonar call design. Audiovocal feedback refers to the monitoring of one's own vocalizations during call production and has been intensively studied in nonecholocating animals. Audiovocal feedback not only is a necessary component of vocal learning but also guides the control of the spectro-temporal structure of vocalizations. Here, we show that audiovocal feedback is directly involved in the echolocating bat's control of sonar call features. As big brown bats tracked targets from a stationary position, we played acoustic jamming signals, simulating calls of another bat, timed to selectively perturb audiovocal feedback or echo feedback. We found that the bats exhibited the largest call-frequency adjustments when the jamming signals occurred during vocal production. By contrast, bats did not show sonar call-frequency adjustments when the jamming signals coincided with the arrival of target echoes. Furthermore, bats rapidly adapted sonar call design in the first vocalization following the jamming signal, revealing a response latency in the range of 66 to 94 ms. Thus, bats, like songbirds and humans, rely on audiovocal feedback to structure sonar signal design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echolocation; jamming avoidance response; sensorimotor integration; speech; vocal production

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28973851      PMCID: PMC5642720          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711892114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

Review 1.  Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; C R Larson; S Kiran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  ECHOLOCATION BY BLIND MEN, BATS AND RADAR.

Authors:  D R Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1944-12-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Fast sensory-motor reactions in echolocating bats to sudden changes during the final buzz and prey intercept.

Authors:  Cornelia Geberl; Signe Brinkløv; Lutz Wiegrebe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats.

Authors:  Noam Cvikel; Eran Levin; Edward Hurme; Ivailo Borissov; Arjan Boonman; Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Three-dimensional auditory localization in the echolocating bat.

Authors:  Melville J Wohlgemuth; Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation.

Authors:  S Sapir; M D McClean; C R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  9 in total

1.  Modeling active sensing reveals echo detection even in large groups of bats.

Authors:  Thejasvi Beleyur; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sensory error drives fine motor adjustment.

Authors:  Huimin Wang; Yuxuan Zhou; Huanhuan Li; Cynthia F Moss; Xingxing Li; Jinhong Luo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Natural Statistics as Inference Principles of Auditory Tuning in Biological and Artificial Midbrain Networks.

Authors:  Sangwook Park; Angeles Salles; Kathryne Allen; Cynthia F Moss; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-06-16

5.  Bats adjust temporal parameters of echolocation pulses but not those of communication calls in response to traffic noise.

Authors:  Shengjing Song; Aiqing Lin; Tinglei Jiang; Xin Zhao; Walter Metzner; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.654

6.  A sensorimotor model shows why a spectral jamming avoidance response does not help bats deal with jamming.

Authors:  Omer Mazar; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The vocal development of the pale spear-nosed bat is dependent on auditory feedback.

Authors:  Ella Z Lattenkamp; Meike Linnenschmidt; Eva Mardus; Sonja C Vernes; Lutz Wiegrebe; Michael Schutte
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Doppler shift compensation performance in Hipposideros pratti across experimental paradigms.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Xindong Wang; Huimin Wang; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01

9.  Neural timing of stimulus events with microsecond precision.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Silvio Macias; Torbjørn V Ness; Gaute T Einevoll; Kechen Zhang; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.