Literature DB >> 9090135

Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

S H Hulse1, S A MacDougall-Shackleton, A B Wisniewski.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the capacity of European starlings to segregate perceptually 2 superimposed, intermixed auditory stimuli. The stimuli were 10-s song samples from 2 of 4 songbird species: European starling, brown thrasher, mockingbird, and nightingale. The birds first learned a discrimination between the intermixed song pairs. Then, they maintained the discrimination with novel song exemplars in the mixtures and when song stimuli for each species were presented alone. Performance fell, but remained above chance, when song pairs were mixed with the dawn chorus of bird song. The results show that starlings were identifying the songs of individual species within the baseline superimposed song pairs, a process of auditory stream segregation and scene analysis (A. S. Bregman, 1990).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090135     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  32 in total

1.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

3.  A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Adrian K C Lee; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A cocktail party with a cortical twist: how cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Planqué; Dominic L Cram; Nathalie Seddon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Background noise exerts diverse effects on the cortical encoding of foreground sounds.

Authors:  B J Malone; Marc A Heiser; Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Grouping in auditory temporal perception and vocal production is mutually adapted: the case of wriggling calls of mice.

Authors:  Simone Gaub; Günter Ehret
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Detection and discrimination of complex sounds by pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Ryan Oliveira
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.